An Application of Principal Agent Theory to Contractual Hiring Arrangements within Public Sector Organizations
- 1 The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, St. Augustine, Trinidad & Tobago
Abstract
This paper critically examines the application of principal agent theory to contractual hiring arrangements of employees in public sector organizations as a contemporary alternative recruitment strategy. Globally, developed and developing nations within the public sector are seeking ways where they can reduce public expenditure and debt while at the same time attempting to increase productivity and efficiency gains by using cost containment initiatives. Thus, private sector methods of outsourcing and contracting are identified as more economically feasible strategies given global recessions and other budgetary constraints within these public agencies. Hence, public management and administration scholars have alluded to the catchy phrase of “doing more with less” (see [1]). Thus, the paper from a theoretically exploratory perspective analyzes how principal agent theory can be applied to the hiring of contingent employees within this sector and the agency problems that may likely arise as a result of these arrangements and their probable economic implications for the said sector.
- Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., Reading.
- Moe, T.M. (1984) The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 737-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2110997
- Gauld, R. (2007) Principal-Agent Theory and Organisational Change: Lessons from New Zealand Health Information Management. Policy Studies, 28, 17-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01442870601121395
- Gutiérrez, ó. (2012) On the Consistency of the First-Order Approach to Principal-Agent Problems. Theoretical Economics Letters, 2, 157-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/tel.2012.22028
- Jewitt, I., Kadan, O. and Swinkels, J. (2008) Moral Hazard with Bounded Payments. Journal of Economic Theory, 143, 59-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2007.12.004
- Kauppi, K. and van Raay, E.M. (2014) Opportunism and Honest Incompetence in Public Procurement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 953-979.
- Mirrlees, J. (1976) The Optimal Structure of Incentives and Authority within an Organization. Bell Journal of Economics, 7, 105-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3003192
- Ross, S. (1973) The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. American Economic Review, 63, 134-139.
- Holmstrom, B. (1979) Moral Hazard and Observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3003320
- Whitford, A.B., Bottom, W.P. and Miller, G.J. (2013) The (Negligible) Benefit of Moving First: Efficiency and Equity in Principal-Agent Negotiations. Group Decision Negot, 22, 499-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-011-9280-4
- Rees, R. (1985) The Theory of Principal and Agent Part 1. Bulletin of Economic Research, 37, 3-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.1985.tb00179.x
- Rees, R. (1985) The Theory of Principal and Agent Part 2. Bulletin of Economic Research, 37, 75-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.1985.tb00185.x
- Walker, P. (2007) Contracts, Entrepreneurs, Market Creation and Judgment: The Contemporary Mainstream Theory of the Firm in Perspective. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29, 317-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joes.12058
- Williamson, O.E. (2000) The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 595-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595