Understanding Consumer Pork Attribute Preferences
- 1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA
- 2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA
- 3 College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA
- 4 Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA
Abstract
The best-worst scaling method was used to investigate consumers’ perceptions of the relative importance of seven different pork production and product attributes. Demographic information was then analyzed to determine which consumer characteristics were statistically significant determinants of these preferences. Of the attributes studied, animal welfare was ranked third most important following pork/food safety and taste. Consumer characteristics including gender, having a source for animal welfare information, and having purchased pork in the last year were found to be determinants of the size of the share of preference for many of the pork attributes stu died.
- Lusk, J. and Briggeman, B. (2009) Food Values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91, 184-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x
- Olynk, N.J., Tonsor, G.T. and Wolf, C.A. (2010) Consumer Willingness to Pay for Livestock Credence Attribute Claim Verification. Western Agricultural Economics Association, 35, 264-280.
- Sacket, H.M., Shupp, R. and Tonsor, G. (2013) Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Farming Practices: A Best-Worst Scenario. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 42, 275-290.
- Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E. and Tuyttens, F.A.M. (2007) Segmentation Based on Consumers’ Perceived Importance and Attitude toward Farm Animal Welfare. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture, 15.
- Kendall, H.A., Lobao, L.M. and Sharp, J.S. (2006) Public Concern with Animal Well-Being: Place, Social Structural Location, and Individual Experience. Rural Sociology, 71, 399-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1526/003601106778070617
- Tonsor, G., Olynk, N.J. and Wolf, C. (2009) Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 41, 713-730.
- McKendree, M.G.S., Widmar, N.O., Ortega, D.L. and Foster, K.A. (2013) Consumer Preferences for Verified Pork-Rearing Practices in the Production of Ham Products. Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economics, 38, 397-417. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/165935/2/JARE,Dec2013,%237,McKendree,pp397G%C3%87%C3%B4417.pdf
- McKendree, M.G.S., Croney, C.C. and Widmar, N.J.O. (2014) Effects of Demographic Factors and Information Sources on United States Consumer Perception of Animal Welfare. Journal of Animal Science, 92, 3161-3173. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-6874
- U.S. Census Bureau (2010) DP-1 Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics: 2010, 2010 Demographic Profile Data. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1&prodType=table
- U.S. Census Bureau (2008-2012) DP01: Selected Economics: 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_12_5YR_DP03&prodType=table
- U.S. Census Bureau (2010) Annual Estimates of Housing Units for the United States, Regions, Divisions, States and Counties: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013: 2013 Population Estimates. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=PEP_2013_PEPANNHU&prodType=table