Causal Relationship between Electricity Consumption and GDP: Plausible Explanation on Previously Found Inconsistent Conclusions for India — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Causal Relationship between Electricity Consumption and GDP: Plausible Explanation on Previously Found Inconsistent Conclusions for India
Using cross-state panel data and error correction Granger causality model we found trustworthy results for India that were non-consistent in previous literature. We found that the electricity consumption and per capita income cause each other. We argue our research to be more credible because we use 254 data points whereas, previous researchers have given their conclusions only on 30 - 40 data points. There is feedback effect of both the variables and effect of electricity consumption is 40 times more than that of income to electricity. Furthermore, analysis at disaggregated level of electricity consumption suggests that domestic and heavy industry electricity consumption causes income growth and not the commercial, light industry, and agricultural electricity consumption.
KeywordsElectricity ConsumptionPanel Granger CausalityError Correction ModelIndian States
Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2000) The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Energy Prices and Economic Growth: Time Series Evidence from Asian Developing Countries. Energy Economics, 22, 615-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(00)00050-5
Masih, A.M.M. and Masih, R. (1996) Energy Consumption, Real Income and Temporal Causality: Results from a Multi-Country Study Based on Cointegration and Error-Correction Modelling Techniques. Energy Economics, 18, 165-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0140-9883(96)00009-6
Gupta, G. and Sahu, N.C. (2009) Causality between Electricity Consumption & Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from India. Munich Personal RePEc Archive [Online]. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/22942/1/MPRA_paper_22942
Soytas, U. and Sari, R. (2003) Energy Consumption and GDP: Causality Relationship in G-7 Countries and Emerging Markets. Energy Economics, 25, 33-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00009-9
Cheng, B.S. (1999) Causality between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in India: An Application of Co-Integration and Error-Correction Modeling. Indian Economic Review, 1, 39-49.
Abbas, F. and Choudhury, N. (2013) Electricity Consumption-Economic Growth Nexus: An Aggregated and Disaggregated Causality Analysis in India and Pakistan. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35, 538-553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2012.09.001
Paul, S. and Bhattacharya, R.N. (2004) Causality between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in India: A Note on Conflicting Results. Energy Economics, 26, 977-983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.07.002
Mohanty, A. and Chaturvedi, D. (2015) Relationship between Electricity Energy Consumption and GDP: Evidence from India. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 7, 186-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v7n2p186
Cowan, W.N., Chang, T., Inglesi-Lotz, R. and Gupta, R. (2014) The Nexus of Electricity Consumption, Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions in the BRICS Countries. Energy Policy, 66, 359-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.081
Ozturk, I. (2010) A Literature Survey on Energy-Growth Nexus. Energy Policy, 38, 340-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.024
Census Organization of India (2011) States Census 2011. Government of India. [Online] http://www.census2011.co.in/states.php
United Nations (2016) 2015 Revision of World Population Prospects. United Nations.
Beenstock, M. and Felsenstein, D. (2015) Estimating Spatial Spillover in Housing Construction with Nonstationary Panel Data. Journal of Housing Economics, 28, 42-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2014.10.002
Stoker, T.M. (2008) Aggregation (Econometrics). In: Durlauf, S. and Blume, L., Eds., The New Palgrave Dictonary of Economics, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Rogerson, P.A. (1983) Comparisons of Aggregate Variable Forecasts Using Aggregate and Disaggregate Models. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 17, 373-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(83)90043-5
Karanfil, F. and Li, Y. (2015) Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth: Exploring Panel-Specific Differences. Energy Policy, 82, 264-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.001
Odhiambo, N.M. (2009) Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in Tanzania: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Energy Policy, 37, 617-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.077
Granger, C.W.J. (1988) Some Recent Development in a Concept of Causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39, 199-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(88)90045-0
Kara, M., Nazlioglu, S. and Agir, H. (2011) Financial Development and Economic Growth Nexus in the MENA Countries: Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis. Economic Modelling, 28, 685-693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.05.015
Canning, D. and Pedroni, P. (2008) Infrastructure, Long-Run Economic Growth and Causality Tests for Cointegrated Panels. The Manchester School, 76, 504-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2008.01073.x
Liddle, B. and Lung, S. (2013) The Long-Run Causal Relationship between Transport Energy Consumption and GDP: Evidence from Heterogeneous Panel Methods Robust to Cross-Sectional Dependence. Economics Letters, 121, 524-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.10.011
CMIE (2016) States of India. [Online]. http://www.cmie.com
Chadha, A. (2009) TRIPs and Patenting Activity: Evidence from the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. Economic Modelling, 26, 499-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2008.10.004
Liddle, B. and Lung, S. (2015) Revisiting Energy Consumption and GDP Causality: Importance of a Priori Hypothesis Testing, Disaggregated Data, and Heterogeneous Panels. Applied Energy, 142, 44-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.036
Alper, C.E. (2002) Business Cycles, Excess Volatility, and Capital Flows: Evidence from Mexico and Turkey. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 38, 25-58.
Erdil, E. and Yetkiner, I.H. (2009) The Granger-Causality between Health Care Expenditure and Output: A Panel Data Approach. Applied Economics, 41, 511-518.