Screening Agents in Belief Eliciting Mechanisms
- 1 Operations Management & Quantitative Techniques Area, Indian Institute of Management Indore, Indore, India
Abstract
This paper considers the problem of a decision maker (DM), who needs to hire an agent to assess the probability of occurrence of an event that is of interest to her. To decide the agent’s reward, the DM proposes a mechanism that will give reward based on the agent’s reported subjective probability and the actual outcome of the event. The reward mechanism needs to incentivize the expert to honestly reveal his subjective probability, and the reward has to be non-negative in all cases in order to ensure agent’s participation. In such a situation, it is possible that there are some agents who lack the expertise to assess the situation, but still participate to get sure non-negative payoff. The DM wants to screen out such uninformed agents from the informed ones. This work considers two mechanisms, and analyzes the behavior of both types of agents for the two mechanisms. It shows that screening is possible along with belief elicitation in some cases.
- Brier, G.W. (1950) Verification of Forecasts Expressed in Terms of Probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078 2.0.CO;2
- Kadane, J.B. and Winkler, R.L. (1988) Separating Probability Elicitation from Utilities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 357-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478605
- Savage, L.J. (1971) Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 783-801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1971.10482346
- Schlag, K.H. and van der Weele, J.J. (2013) Eliciting Probabilities, Means, Medians, Variances and Covariances without Assuming Risk Neutrality. Theoretical Economics Letters, 3, 38-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/tel.2013.31006
- Sandroni, A. and Shmaya, E. (2013) Eliciting Beliefs by Paying in Chance. Economic Theory Bulletin, 1, 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40505-013-0009-1
- Allen, F. (1987) Discovering Personal Probabilities When Utility Functions Are Unknown. Management Science, 33, 542-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.4.542
- Karni, E. (2009) A Mechanism for Eliciting Probabilities. Econometrica, 77, 603-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7833
- Hossain, T. and Okui, R. (2013) The Binarized Scoring Rule. The Review of Economic Studies, 80, 984-1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt006
- Sandroni, A. (2014) At Least Do No Harm: The Use of Scarce Data. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/mic.6.1.1
- Hao, L. and Houser, D. (2012) Belief Elicitation in the Presence of Naive Respondents: An Experimental Study. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44, 161-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-011-9133-1
- Olszewski, W. and Peaski, M. (2011) The Principal-Agent Approach to Testing Experts. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3, 89-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/mic.3.2.89
- Armantier, O. and Treich, N. (2013) Eliciting Beliefs: Proper Scoring Rules, Incentives, Stakes and Hedging. European Economic Review, 62, 17-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.03.008
- Gachter, S. and Renner, E. (2010) The Effects of (Incentivized) Belief Elicitation in Public Goods Experiments. Experimental Economics, 13, 364-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-010-9246-4
- Schotter, A. and Trevino, I. (2014) Belief Elicitation in the Laboratory. Annual Review Economics, 6, 103-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040927