Behavioural Finance: A Re-Examination of Prospect Theory
- 1 Department of Finance and Control, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkata, India
- 2 Department of Finance and Control, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkata, India
Abstract
Behavioural finance has received a major impetus over the last two decades. In this paper, we discuss the foundations which have helped in this paradigm shift from traditional Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) to the more experimental branch of finance, namely behavioural finance. We discuss EMH in the context of its critics, and present alternative theories as well as psychological concepts that are useful in understanding behavioural finance. We conduct 3 separate experiments to test Prospect theory, a popular theory put forth by Kahneman & Tversky [1]. We conduct the experiments on a different type of respondent group than that has been used in the past. Using a relatively homogenous group well versed in probability and statistics, we find that career professionals exhibit less biases than student subjects that have been used in such experiments in the past.
- Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
- Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1997) The Limits of Arbitrage. The Journal of Finance, 52, 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03807.x
- Fama, E.F. (1970) Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25, 383-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
- Niederhoffer, V. and Osborne, M.F.M. (1966) Market Making and Reversal on the Stock Exchange. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61, 897-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1966.10482183
- Breen, W. (1968) Low Price-Earnings Ratios and Industry Relatives. Financial Analysts Journal, 24, 125-127. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4470381 https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v24.n4.125
- Basu, S. (1977) Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. The Journal of Finance, 32, 663-682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb01979.x
- Ball, R. (1978) Anomalies in Relationships between Securities’ Yields and Yield-Surrogates. Journal of Financial Economics, 6, 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(78)90026-0
- Watts, R.L. (1978) Systematic “Abnormal” Returns after Quarterly Earnings Announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 6, 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(78)90027-2
- Jensen, M.C. (1978) Some Anomalous Evidence Regarding Market Efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 6, 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(78)90025-9
- Roll, R. and Ross, S.A. (1980) An Empirical Investigation of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory. The Journal of Finance, 35, 1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1980.tb02197.x
- Bondt, W. and Thaler, R.H. (1985) Does the Stock Market Overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40, 793-805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05004.x
- Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (1993) Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48, 65-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
- Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1994) Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk. The Journal of Finance, 49, 1541-1578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04772.x