The Regulation of All Pay Auctions: Is There Need for Greater Regulation of Online Auctioneers?
- 1 Department of Finance, Deakin Business School, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
Abstract
Auctions are a ubiquitous process, with auctioneers playing a critical role in serving as a bridge between buyers and sellers, and as such assisting in the process of price discovery. Given this critical role, the regulation of auctions and auctioneers is of particular concern. The emergence of online selling has raised a number of pertinent questions about how the industry should be regulated. In particular so - called penny auctions (in economic parlance “unit bid auction”) have raised a number of pertinent questions about consumer protections. Whether these online selling models constitute auctions, and whether they mirror “bricks and mortar” rivals remain pertinent questions. Moreover, the adequacy of the regulatory apparatus that moderates the activities of auctioneers operating within conventional “analogue markets” is uncertain when such apparatus is applied to “digital markets” involving online selling through auction like processes. The current study considers need for regulation of unit bit auction in light of the underlying economics of such auction models. The model suggests that enhanced disclosure and greater regulation may ultimately be necessary.
- Tokeley, K. (2016) Towards a New Regulatory Regime for New Zealand Online Auctions. New Zealand Law Review, 2011, 91-119.
- Marshall, R.C. and Meurer, M.J. (2004) Bidder Collusion and Antitrust Law: Refining the Analysis of Price Fixing to Account for the Special Features of Auction Markets. Antitrust Law Journal, 72, 83-118.
- Favre, E. (2007) Online Auction Houses: How Trademark Owners Protect Brand Integrity Against Counterfeiting. Journal of Law and Policy, 15, 165.
- Calkins, M.M., Alexei, N. and Richardson, V. (2008) Mineshafts on Treasure Island: A Relief Map of the EBay Fraud Landscape. Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.5195/tlp.2008.42
- Gawith, D. (2006) Non Litigation-Based Redress for International Consumer Transactions Is Not Cost Effective—A Case for Reform? Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 3, 115-150.
- Peene, B. (2010) Lux for Less: EBay’s Liability to Luxury Brands for the Sale of Counterfeit Goods. Seton Hall Law Review, 40, 1077-1115.
- Shubik, M. (2004) The Theory of Money and Financial Institutions. MIT Press, Cambridge.
- Doyle, R. and Steve, B. (2002) History of Auctions: From Ancient Rome to Today’s High-Tech Auctions. The Auctioneer, Vol., page.
- Volk, D.B. (2007) Principles-Oriented Approach to Regulating Reverse Auctions. Public Contract Law Journal, 37, 127-139.
- Oh, P. (2007) The Dutch Auction Myth. Wake Forest Law Review, 42, 853.
- Siegel, R. (2009) All-Pay Contests. Econometrica, 77, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7537
- Krishna, V. and Morgan, J. (1997) An Analysis of the War of Attrition and the All-Pay Auction. Journal of Economic Theory, 72, 343-362. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.2208
- Augenblick, N. (2009) Consumer and Producer Behavior in the Market for Penny Auctions: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Stanford University, Stanford. http://www.stanford.edu/~ned789
- Kariyawasam, K. and Scott, G. (2008) Contractual Legalities of Buying and Selling on EBay: Online Auctions and the Protection of Consumers. Journal of Law, Information and Science, 19, 42.
- Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R. and Kahn, C.M. (1998) Multi-Unit Auctions with Uniform Prices. Economic Theory, 12, 227-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001990050220