Effect of Adjacent Product Price on Customer’s Willingness to Pay of Focal Brand: A Bayesian Approach
- 1 Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode (IIMK), Kozhikode, India
Abstract
Psychological researchers, while studying internal reference price, have dealt with different types of psychological effects like attraction effect and compromise effect. While studying consumer reference price and willingness to pay, marketing researchers have focused on consumers’ perception about a brand by evaluating several attributes of that brand. Our research investigates the incremental effect on consumers’ willingness to pay in a context where an adjacent price is present, for instance, when a medium priced brand is associated with a high price brand than a moderately high priced brand. Unlike other pricing research, this research deals with consumer’s individual level heterogeneity as price sensitivity and consumers’ willingness to pay for a particular brand since they vary among individual. Hierarchical Bayes methodology is used to incorporate such heterogeneity. The study shows significant difference in consumers’ utility and her willingness to pay when a medium priced brand is compared with a high priced brand as against a moderately high priced brand.
- Montgomery, H. (1983) Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making. In: Humphreys, P.C., et al., Eds., Analyzing and Aiding Decision Process, North-Holland, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62243-8
- Slovic, P. (1975) Choice between Equally-Valued Alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.280
- Huber, J. and Puto, C. (1983) Marketing Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1086/208943
- Simonson, I. (1989) Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158-174. https://doi.org/10.1086/209205
- Ratneshwar, S., Shocker, A.D. and Stewart, D.W. (1987) Towards Understanding the Attraction Effect: The Implication of Product Stimulus Meaningfulness and Familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 520-533. https://doi.org/10.1086/209085
- Samuelson, P.A. and Nordhaus, W.D. (2001) Microeconomics. ISE Editions, McGraw-Hill Education, New York.
- Nunes, J.C. and Boatwright, P. (2004) Incidental Prices and Their Effect on Willingness to Pay. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 457-466. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.4.457.47014
- Monroe, K.B. (1990) Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. 2nd Edition, McGraw Hill, New York.
- Monroe, K.B. (1973) Buyers’ Subjective Perceptions of Price. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 70-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149411
- Mazumdar, T., Raj, S.P. and Sinha, I. (2005) Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69, 84-102. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.84
- Adhikari, A. and Rao, A.K. (2013) Individual Preference and Bargaining Behavior in Families’ Buying Decisions of Restaurant Service. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54, 248-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965512459801
- Allenby, G.M. and Ginter, J. (1995) Using Extremes to Design Products and Segment Markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 392-403. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152175
- Lenk, P., DeSarbo, W., Green, P.E. and Young, M. (1996) Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Part-Worth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental Design. Marketing Science, 15, 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.15.2.173