The Macro-Share Economy and Nominal GDP Targeting
- 1 Finance and Market Department, College of Business and Public Administration, Eastern Washington University, Spokane, USA
Abstract
Using the Pareto criterion and competitive microfoundations, this paper challenges the consensus’ focus on inflation control as the goal of monetary economic policy. It is the price level, not inflation per se, that determines whether a borrower or lender gains or loses. Pareto efficiency suggests that the goal of monetary policy should be to minimize, not inflation risk, not even price-level risk, but rather share risk. Share risk is the risk that a predetermined payment as a share of the whole economy will differ from expectations. We conclude that to minimize share risk, central banks should target nominal GDP. Minimizing share risk also helps to minimize employment risk. We show this latter result using a tautological relationship between three variables: 1) hours of employment, 2) the average wage share of the economy, and 3) the percent of nominal GDP going to employee compensation. We use US data on these three variables before, during, and after the 2007-2008 Financial Crisis to study this relationship.
- Eagle, D. and Domian, D. (2005) Quasi-Real Indexing—The Pareto-Efficient Solution to Inflation Indexing. Finance 0509017, EconWPA. http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/fin/papers/0509/0509017.pdf
- Koenig, E. (2013) Like a Good Neighbor: Monetary Policy, Financial Stability, and the Distribution of Risk. International Journal of Central Banking, 9, 57-82.
- Doepke, M. and Schneider, M. (2015) Distributional Effects of Monetary Policy. Hutchins Center Working Paper #14. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1787807234?pq-origsite=gscholar
- Svensson, L. (1999) Price-Level Targeting versus Inflation Targeting: A Free Lunch? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 31, 277-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/2601112
- Kahn, G. (2009) Beyond Inflation Targeting: Should Central Banks Target the Price Level? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Economic Review, 35-64.
- Shukayev, M. and Ueberfeldt, A. (2010) Price Level Targeting: What Is the Right Price? https://www.bankofcanada.ca/2010/02/working-paper-2010-8/
- Woodford, M. (2001) The Taylor Rule and Optimal Monetary Policy. http://www.columbia.edu/~mw2230/taylor.pdf
- Eagle, D. and Christensen, L. (2012) Two Equations on the Pareto-Efficient Sharing of Real GDP Risk. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/cgi/users/home?screen=EPrint::View&eprintid=41051
- Eagle, D. (2005) Completing Markets in a One-Good, Pure Exchange Economy Without State-Contingent Securities. Finance 0501009, EconWPA. http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/fin/papers/0501/0501009.pdf
- Sheedy, K.D. (2014) Debt and Incomplete Financial Markets: A Case for Nominal GDP Targeting. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 301-373. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2014.0005
- Mankiw, N.G. (2009) New Keynesian Economics The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/NewKeynesianEconomics.html
- Keynes, J.M. (1923) A Tract on Monetary Reform, Chapter 3.
- Cochrane, J.H. (2011) Determinacy and Identification with Taylor Rules. Journal of Political Economy, 119, 565-615. https://doi.org/10.1086/660817
- Eagle, D. (2012) Liquidity Traps and the Price (In)Determinacy of Monetary Rules. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/42416/1/Liquidity_Traps_Paper.pdf
- Krugman, P. (2011) A Volcker Moment Indeed (Slightly Wonkish). The Economist. https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/30/a-volcker-moment-indeed-slightly-wonkish/