Risk Correlation Based on Time-Varying Copula Function and Extreme Value Theory
- 1 The School of Finance, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou, China
- 2 Faculty of Business and Economics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- 3 The School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
Abstract
The dependence structure of financial assets in financial risk measurement is very important, the tail relations in particular. Authors of extant studies in this field tended to focus on the linear analysis of the financial assets, rarely considering nonlinear, asymmetric and thick-tail characteristics. Here, we apply the copulas connection function with time-varying factors to discuss the risk dependency relationship between financial assets. Moreover, we develop an SV-EVT model to fit variables’ marginal distribution combined with stochastic volatility and extreme value theory. Finally, we present an empirical comparative study of static and dynamic copula models applied to the sample comprising of the Chinese mainland A-shares and Hong Kong stock market. The results show that the CSJC copulas connection function describes the tail features of stock index better than the normal copulas connection function. Similarly, the time-varying model outperforms the static copulas model. Furthermore, we observe an asymmetry dependence change rule between Chinese mainland A-shares market and the Hong Kong stock market; the correlation of lower tail is significantly higher than that of the upper tail, and the bear market effect is remarkable. These findings indicate that time-varying Copulas-SV-EVT model can depict the correlation of financial asset tails exactly, and can thus be used to control investment risk and forecast abnormal fluctuations.
- Embrechts, P., McNeil, A. and Strausmann, D. (2002) Correlation and Dependence in Risk Management: Proper Ties and Pitfalls. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 176-233.
- Embrechts, P., McNeil, A. and Straumann, D. (1999) Correlation: Pitfalls and alternatives. Risk, 12, 69-71.
- Bouyé, E., Durrleman, V., Nikeghbali, A., Riboulet, G. and Roncalli, T. (2001) Copulas: An Open Field for Risk Management. Working Paper. Goupe de Recherche Opérationnelle, Crédit Lyonnais, Lyon.
- Zhang, T.R. (2002) Copula and Financial Risk Analysis. Statistical Research, 4, 48-51. (In Chinese)
- Rodriguez, J.C. (2007) Measuring Financial Contagion: A Copula Approach. Journal of Empirical Finance, 14, 401-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2006.07.002
- Embrechts, P., Hoeing, A. and Juri, A. (2003) Using Copula to Bound the Value-at-Risk for Function of Dependent Risks. Finance and Stochastics, 7, 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007800200085
- Wang, Y.Q. and Liu, S.W. (2011) Financial Market Openness and Risk Contagion: A Time-Varying Copula Approach. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 4, 778-784.
- Patton Andrew, J. (2006) Modeling Asymmetric Exchange Rate Dependence. International Economic Review, 2, 527-555.
- Gong, P. and Huang, R.B. (2008) Analysis of the Time-Varying Dependence of Foreign Exchange Assets. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 8, 26-38.
- Li, X.M. and Shi, D.J. (2006) Research on Dependence Structure between Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Markets. Application of Statistics and Management, 25, 729-736. (In Chinese)
- Ren, X.L., Ye, M.Q. and Zhang, S.Y. (2009) Analysis of Portfolio Efficient Frontier Based on Copula-APD-GARCH Model. Chinese Journal of Management, 6, 1528-1535. (In Chinese)
- Yu, S.H., Zhang, S.Y. and Song, J. (2004) Comparison of VaR Based on GARCH and SV Models. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 7, 61-65. (In Chinese)
- Bollerslev, T. (2001) Financial Econometrics: Past Developments and Future Challenges. Journal of Econometrics, 100, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00052-X
- Zhan, X.L. and Zhang, S.Y. (2007) Risk Analysis of Financial Portfolio Based on Copula-SV Model. Journal of Systems & Management, 3, 302-306. (In Chinese)
- Ramazan, G. and Faruk, S. (2006) Overnight Borrowing, Interest Rates and Extreme Value Theory. European Economic Review, 50, 547-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.10.010