Evaluating Volatility Forecasts with Ultra-High-Frequency Data—Evidence from the Australian Equity Market
- 1 Department of Applied Finance and Actuarial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- 2 Department of Applied Finance and Actuarial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- 3 Department of Applied Finance and Actuarial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Abstract
Due to the unobserved nature of the true return variation process, one of the most challenging problems in evaluation of volatility forecasts is to find an accurate benchmark proxy for ex - post volatility. This paper uses the Australia n equity market ultra-high-frequency data to construct an unbiased ex - post volatility estimator and then use it as a benchmark to evaluate various practical volatility forecasting strategies (GARCH class model based). These forecasting strategies allow for the skewed distribution of innovations and use various estimation windows in addition to the standard GARCH volatility models. In out-of-sample tests, we find that forecasting errors across all model specifications are systematically reduced if using the unbiased ex - post volatility estimator compared with those using the realized volatility based on sparsely sampled intra-day data. In particular, we show that the three benchmark forecasting models outperform most of the modified strategies with different distribution of returns and estimation windows. Comparing the three standard GARCH class models, we find that the asymmetric power ARCH (APARCH) model exhibits the best forecasting power in both normal and financial turmoil periods, which indicates the ability of APARCH model to capture the leptokurtic returns and stylized features of volatility in the Australian stock market.
- Engle, R.F. (1982) Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50, 987-1007.
- Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
- Bollerslev, T. (2009) Glossary to Arch (Garch). In: Bollerslev, T., Russell, J. and Watson, M., Eds., Volatility and Time Series Econometrics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R. and Runkle, D.E. (1993) On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks. The Journal of Finance, 48, 1779-1801.
- Zakoian, J.-M. (1994) Threshold Heteroskedastic Models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, 931-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(94)90039-6
- Ding, Z., Granger, C.W.J. and Engle, R.F. (1993) A Long Memory Property of Stock Market Returns and a New Model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1, 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-5398(93)90006-D
- Andersen, T.G. and Bollerslev, T. (1998) Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models do Provide Accurate Forecasts. International Economic Review, 39, 885-905.
- Cumby, R., Figlewski, S. and Hasbrouck, J. (1993) Forecasting Volatilities and Correlations with Egarch Models. The Journal of Derivatives, 1, 51-63. https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1993.407877
- Figlewski, S. (1997) Forecasting Volatility. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 6, 1-88.
- Jorion, P. (1995) Predicting Volatility in the Foreign Exchange Market. The Journal of Finance, 50, 507-528.
- Zhang, L., Mykland, P.A. and Ait-Sahalia, Y. (2005) A Tale of Two Time Scales. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 1394-1411.
- Ait-Sahalia, Y., Mykland, P.A. and Zhang, L. (2011) Ultra High Frequency Volatility Estimation with Dependent Microstructure Noise. Journal of Econometrics, 160, 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.028
- Brailsford, T.J. and Faff, R.W. (1996) An Evaluation of Volatility Forecasting Techniques. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20, 419-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(95)00015-1
- Carvajal, M., Coulton, J.J. and Jackson, A.B. (2017) Earnings Benchmark Hierarchy. Accounting & Finance, 57, 87-111.