Governance Matters and Economic Growth: Beyond the Egyptian Revolution
- 1 The Arab Academy for Science and Technology (AAST), Alexandria, Egypt
- 2 Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
Abstract
Following the Egyptian revolution in January 2011, the need for a new development approach has become essential. That is development with a human face. This study aims to contribute to the discussion on sustainable economic growth in Egypt by examining the interdependence of inclusive governance, economic and social inclusion, through empirically assessing the relationship between governance indicators and economic growth in Egypt. The study applied a vector error correction model (VECM) to assess the causal relationship between the two key variables, using Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) from the World Bank and economic indicators from Economic Intelligent Unit (EIU) database over the period 1996-2016. The results show that the Egyptian economy suffered during the study period from a significant decrease in the level of governance. The analysis indicated that most of the governance indicators have a causal relationship with economic growth except corruption control, while economic growth has a positive effect and contributes to the development of political stability and regulatory quality. The paper concludes that appropriate initiatives and efficient governance could play a significant role in influencing economic growth in Egypt. This is consistent with previous studies on the impact of institutions on economic growth and development. However, these results need further investigation to determine additional key variables that influence the growth of GDP in Egypt.
- Bibi, S. and Nabli, M. (2010) Equity and Inequality in the Arab Region. Policy Research Report 33.
- UNDP (2011) Arab Development Challenges: Toward the Developmental State in the Arab Region. United Nations Development Programme, Regional Centre for Arab States, Cairo.
- Malik, A. and Awadallah, B. (2013) The Economics of the Arab Spring. World Development, 45, 296-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.12.015
- Kaufmann, D. and Kraay, A. (2008) Governance Indicators: Where Are We, Where Should We Be Going? The World Bank Research Observer, 23, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkm012
- Globerman, S. and Shapiro, D. (2002) Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructure. World Development, 30, 1899-1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00110-9
- Akpan, G.E. and Effiong, E.L. (2012) Governance and Development Performance: A Cross-Country Analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3, 54-65. http://pakacademicsearch.com/pdf-files/ech/520/54-65%20Vol%203,%20No%2014%20(2012).pdf
- UNDP (1997) Governance for Sustainable Human Development—A UNDP Policy Document. UNDP, New York.
- Resnick, D. and Birner, R. (2006) Does Good Governance Contribute to Pro-Poor Growth? A Review of the Evidence from Cross-Country Studies. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC.
- Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1999) Aggregating Governance Indicators. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC.
- Chibba, M. (2009) Governance and Development: The Current Role of Theory, Policy and Practice. World Economics, 10, 79–108.
- Rodrik, D. (2008) Thinking about Governance. Governance, Growth and Development Decision-Making. World Bank, Washington DC.
- North, D.C., Wallis, J.J. and Weingast, B.R. (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575839
- Aron, J. (2000) Growth and Institutions: A Review of the Evidence. World Bank Research Observer, 15, 99-135. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.1.99
- Gagliardi, F. (2008) Institutions and Economic Change: A Critical Survey of the New Institutional Approaches and Empirical Evidence. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 416-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.001