Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Benefits Distribution of Tri-Networks Convergence Chain
- 1
- 2
- 3
Theoretical Economics Letters·Volume 01 (2011)·Pages 73–80·Published 3 November 2011·DOI10.4236/tel.2011.13016
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the characteristic function of all the coalitions of the Tri-networks Convergence chain and research on the benefit distribution of Tri-networks Convergence chain based on Shapley value. We find that the broadcasting and the telecommunication operator can achieve cooperative and turn a win-lose situation into a win-win situation of reduced costs and increased revenues for the Tri-networks Convergence chain.
KeywordsTri-Networks Convergence ChainBenefit DistributeShapley ValueMini-Max Theorem
- N. Stieglitz, “Industry Dynamics and Types of Convergence, the Evolution of the Personal Digital Assistant Market in the 1990s and Beyond 2003,” Industrial and Corpoeate Change, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2011, pp. 57-89.
- S. Li, Z. Huang, J. Zhu and P. Chau, “Cooperative Advertising, Game Theory and Manufacturer-Telecommu- nication and Internet Operators Supply Chains,” The In- ternational Journal of Management Science, Vol. 30, 2002, pp. 347-357.
- D. B. Yoffie, “Competing in the Age of Digital Conver- gence,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1997.
- B. Clements “The Impact of Convergence on Regulatory Policy,” Telecommunication Policy, Vol. 22, No. , 1998, pp. 197-205.
- Z. Huang, S. Li and V. Mahajan, “An Analysis of Manu- facturer-Telecommunication and Internet Operators Sup- ply Chain Coordination in Cooperative Advertising,” De- cision Sciences, Vol. 33, 2002, pp. 469-494.
- J. Freixas, “The Shapley-Shubik Power Index for Games with Several Levels of Approval in the Input and Output,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2005b, pp. 185-195.
- H. P. Young, “Monotonic Solutions of Cooperative Games,” International Journal of Game Theory, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1985, pp. 65-72.
- H. P. Young, “Cost Allocation,” In: The Handbook of Game Theory, Volume II, R. J. Aumann and S. Hart, Eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 1193-1235.
- S. Hart and A. Mas-Colell, “Bargaining and Value,” Eco- nometrica, Vol. 64, No. 2, 1996, pp. 357-380.
- J. C. Harsanyi, “A Simplified Bargaining Model for the n-Person Cooperative Game,” International Economic Re- view, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1963, pp. 194-220.
- F. Gul, “Efficiency and Immediate Agreement: A Reply to Hart and Levy,” Econometrica, Vol. 67, No. 4, 1999, pp. 913-918.
- E. Winter, “The Demand Commitment Bargaining and Snow- balling Cooperation,” Economic Theory, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1994, pp. 255-273.
- D. Perez-Castrillo and D. Wettstein, “Bidding for the Sur- plus: A Non-Cooperative Approach to the Shapley Value,” Ben-Gurion University, Monaster Center for Economic Research, DP 99-7, 1999.
- O’Neill Jr., P. Thomas and W. Novak, “Man of the House: The Life and Political Memoirs of Speaker Tip O’Neill,” Random House, New Yourk, 1987.
- J. N. Brown and R. W. Rosenthal, “Testing the Minimax Hypothesis: A Re-Examination of O’Neill’s Game Expe- riment,” Econometrica, Vol. 58, No. 5, 1990, pp. 1065- 1081. doi:10.2307/2938300