Implications of Trade Policies in Segmented Factor Markets—A General Equilibrium Approach
- 1 Faculty Block I, IIMK Campus, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode, Kozhikode, India
- 2 IIMK Campus, Kozhikode, India
Abstract
This paper, using a three-sector full-employment general equilibrium model with segmented domestic factor markets, explains how and under what conditions a policy of import restriction using tariffs can be beneficial for a small, open economy compared to the import liberalisation policy, contrary to the conventional results. Also, inflows of foreign-owned capital to an export sector within the economy’s export processing zone coupled with labour-augm enting t ype technology transfer, with protected import-competing sector, can improve national income, even without any distortion in the formal sector labour market. This simple application of competitive trade models establishes the fact that trade restrictions can promote growth and attract FDI for the developing countries, even when foreign capital enters one specific export sector of the economy.
- Yanikkaya, H. (2003) Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 57-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00068-3
- Motta, M. (1992) Multinational Firm and Tariff-Jumping Argument: A Game Theoretic Analysis with Some Unconventional Conclusions. European Economic Review, 36, 1557-1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(92)90006-I
- Yanagawa, N. (1990) Foreign Direct Investment for Tariff-Jumping. Economic Studies Quarterly, 41, 353-366.
- Sen, A.K. (1974) Informal Bases of Alternative Welfare Approaches: Aggregation and Income Distribution. Journal of Public Economics, 4, 387-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90006-1
- Hamada, K. (1974) An Economic Analysis of the Duty Free Zone. Journal of International Economics, 4, 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(74)90044-0
- Hamilton, C. and Svensson, L.O. (1982) On the Welfare Effects of a “Duty Free” Zone. Journal of International Economics, 13, 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(82)90005-8
- Beladi, H. and Marjit, S. (1992) Foreign Capital and Protectionism. Canadian Journal of Economics, 25, 233-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/135722
- Din, M.-U. (1994) Export Processing Zones and Backward Linkage. Journal of Development Economics, 43, 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(94)90014-0
- Yabuuchi, S. (2000) Export Processing Zones, Backward Linkages, and Variable Returns to Scale. Review of Development Economics, 4, 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00094
- Koizumi, T. and Kopecky, K.J. (1977) Economic Growth, Capital Movements and the International Transfer of Technical Knowledge. Journal of International Economics, 7, 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(77)90004-6
- Koizumi, T. and Kopecky, K.J. (1980) Foreign Direct Investment, Technology Transfer and Domestic Employment Effects. Journal of International Economics, 10, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(80)90028-8
- Findlay, R. (1978) Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885996
- Mansfield, E.M. (1961) Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation. Econometrica, 9, 741-766. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911817
- Mansfield, E.M. (1968) Industrial Research and Technological Innovation. Norton, New York.