Carbon Emissions and Stock Returns: Evidence from the Chinese Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme
- 1 School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, Albany, New Zealand
- 2 School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, Albany, New Zealand
Abstract
In response to mounting evidence of climate change and the Kyoto Protocol, in 2011, the Chinese central government decided to build a nationwide carbon emissions scheme, beginning with seven pilot schemes launched in 2013. These pilot schemes were based on the similar European Emissions Trading Scheme. Oestreich and Tsiakas [1] examine the European scheme, finding when carbon emission allowances were granted free of charge, firms who received them (defined as “dirty” firms) outperformed the firms who did not (defined as “clean firms”), indicating that there is a significant “carbon premium.” This study follows the methodology of Oestreich and Tsiakas [1] with Chinese data from the largest of the pilot schemes, the Shenzhen Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme. We find no positive, significant carbon premium but do find weak evidence of a negative premium for a special group of “very dirty” firms.
- Oestreich, A.M. and Tsiakas, I. (2015) Carbon Emissions and Stock Returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Journal of Banking & Finance, 58, 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.05.005
- Shi, X. (2018) China’s Emissions Trading Scheme: What It Means for Australia. ACRIFacts.
- Goulder, L.H., Hafstead, M.A. and Dworsky, M. (2010) Impacts of Alternative Emissions Allowance Allocation Methods under a Federal Cap-and-Trade Program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60, 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.06.002
- Litterman, B. (2013) What Is the Right Price for Carbon Emissions. Regulation, 36, 38.
- Pindyck, R.S. (2013) Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 860-872. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.3.860
- Ellerman, A.D. and Buchner, B.K. (2007) The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1, 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rem003
- Oberndorfer, U. (2009) EU Emission Allowances and the Stock Market: Evidence from the Electricity Industry. Ecological Economics, 68, 1116-1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.026
- Carraro, C. and Favero, A. (2009) The Economic and Financial Determinants of Carbon Prices. Finance aUver: Czech Journal of Economics & Finance, 59.
- Trück, S., Hardle, W.K. and Weron, R. (2014) The Relationship between Spot and Futures CO 2 Emission Allowance Prices in the EU-ETS. In: Gronwald and Hintermann, Eds., Emission Trading Systems as a Climate Policy Instrument Evaluation and Prospects, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (Forthcoming) https://ssrn.com/abstract=2137346 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2137346
- Chapple, L., Clarkson, P.M. and Gold, D.L. (2013) The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme (ETS). Abacus, 49, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12006
- Bushnell, J.B., Chong, H. and Mansur, E.T. (2013) Profiting from Regulation: Evidence from the European Carbon Market. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5, 78-106. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.5.4.78
- Chen, Y. and Lin, S. (2015) Decomposition and Allocation of Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowance over Provinces of China. Natural Hazards, 76, 1893-1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1576-7