Should We Enhance or Restrict Technological Diffusion from Major to Minor Firms?
- 1 Faculty of Economics, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
- 2 Faculty of Economics, Daito Bunka University, Tokyo, Japan
Abstract
This study examines how technological diffusion from a major firm to a minor firm affects social welfare via R & D competition in an asymmetric Cournot duopoly. We assume that the minor firm can decrease its production cost because of the spillover effect arising through R & D by the major firm. R & D by the minor firm depends on the free-riding effect and a taking-away effect that removes market share from the major firm. If given a low R & D cost, both firms invest in R & D with an appropriate level of technological diffusion, we can obtain a high level of social welfare. However, an increase in the level of technological diffusion could make the major firm abandon R & D activity. Given a high R & D cost, a high level of welfare can be obtained only with a low level of technological diffusion because the potential presence of technological diffusion easily disrupts R & D by the major firm.
- Bernstein, J.I. and Pierre, M. (1998) International R & D Spillovers between U.S. and Japanese R & D Intensive Sectors. Journal of International Economics, 44, 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00026-3
- Keller, W. (2004) International Technology Diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 92, 752-782. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051042177685
- Braguinsky, S. (2015) Knowledge Diffusion and Industry Growth: The Case of Japan’s Early Cotton Spinning Industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24, 769-790. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv029
- Xie, W. and Wu, G. (2003) Differences between Learning Processes in Small Tigers and Large Dragons: Learning Processes of Two Colour TV (CTV) Firms within China. Research Policy, 32, 1463-1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00140-3
- Huang, S. and Qiao, W. (2005) The Development of China’s Electronics Industry: Causes and Constraints. China and World Economy, 13, 107-122.
- Chen, C., Sheng, Y. and Findlay, C. (2013) Export Spillovers and FDI on China’s Domestic Firms. Review of International Economics, 21, 841-856. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12074
- Ferrett, B. (2012) R & D Competition in an Asymmetric Cournot Duopoly: The Welfare Effects of Catch-Up by the Lagged Firm. mimeo.
- Lahiri, S. and Ono, Y. (1988) Helping Minor Firms Reduces Welfare. Economic Journal, 98, 1199-1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233727
- Katz, M. and Shapiro, C. (1985) On the Licensing of Innovation. Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 504-520.
- Klemperer, P. (1990) How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be? Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 223-230.
- Sakakibara, M. and Branstetter, L. (2001) Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1998 Japanese Patent Law Reforms. Rand Journal of Economics, 32, 77-100.
- Futagami, K. and Iwaisako, T. (2007) Dynamic Analysis of Patent Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model. Journal of Economic Theory, 132, 306-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2005.07.009