Effect of Reference Price in PWYTF Pricing in Tourism Sector
- 1 Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode, Kozhikode, India
Abstract
While conventional pricing strategy involves sellers to decide price of a tourism product, tourism companies carry the risk of capacity underutilization in many occasions when fixed costs are already incurred. Pay What You Think Fair (PWYTF) pricing mechanism motivates tourists to pay a fair price for unutilized capacity, thereby, increasing sales and profit for marketers. This study shows that PWYTF pricing mechanism with a concrete reference price of customer can generate significantly higher revenue and profit for a long period of time. We have conducted three experiments to show that PWYTF pricing strategy is a profitable and sustainable pricing solution for tourism companies to increase revenue during off-season as well as underutilization of hired capacity. This study opens a new avenue in pricing methods used in tourism industry and contribute s in significant way both in academic and practice.
- Guo, X., Ling, L., Dong, Y. and Liang, L. (2013) Cooperation Contract in Tourism Supply Chains: The Optimal Pricing Strategy of Hotels for Cooperative Third Party Strategic Websites. Annals of Tourism Research, 41, 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.11.009
- Clarke, H.R. and Ng, Y.K. (1993) Tourism, Economic Welfare and Efficient Pricing. Annals of Tourism Research, 20, 613-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(93)90087-J
- Adhikari, A., Basu, A. and Raj, S.P. (2013) Pricing of Experience Products under Consumer Heterogeneity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.01.002
- Keane, M.J. (1997) Quality and Pricing in Tourism Destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 24, 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(96)00034-5
- Adhikari, A. and Bhattacharya, S. (2015) Appraisal of Literature on Customer Experience in Tourism Sector: Review and Framework. Current Issues in Tourism, 1-26.
- Spann, M. and Tellis, G. (2006) Does Internet Promote Better Consumer Decisions: A Case of Name Your Own Price Auctions. Journal of Marketing, 70, 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.1.065.qxd
- Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2009) Pay What You Want: A New Participative Pricing Mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73, 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.044
- Neumann, V.J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944) The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.
- Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Nelson, L.D. and Brown, A. (2010) Shared Social Responsibility: A Field Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving. Science, 329, 325-327. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186744
- Chandran, S. and Morwitz, V.G. (2005) Effects of Participative Pricing on Consumers’ Cognitions and Actions: A Goal Theoretic Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1086/432234
- Varian, H.R. (1976) Two Problems in the Theory of Fairness. Journal of Public Economics, 5, 249-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(76)90018-9
- Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press.
- Sharifi-Tehrani, M., Verbic, M. and Chung, J.Y. (2013) An Analysis of Adopting Dual Pricing for Museums: The Case of the National Museum of IRAN. Annals of Tourism Research, 43, 58-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.04.001