Fair Employee Treatment and Financial Characteristics of Firms
- 1 FORE School of Management, New Delhi, India
- 2 FORE School of Management, New Delhi, India
Abstract
Present paper investigates the interactions between firm’s key financial decisions and its fair employee treatment and welfare policies. Fair employee treatment has two components—measurable and unmeasurable. Certain ratios like employee compensation to sales, employee compensation to total assets, and total employee welfare to sales are computed to capture the measurable part of fair employee treatment. To envisage the unmeasurable component, a dummy variable for fair employee treatment is used which is based on the listing of the firm in India’s Best Companies to Work for 2017: The complete List prepared by Great Place to Work and published by Economic Times. Linear multiple regression analysis is conducted using firm’s leverage, price to book value, and enterprise value to EBDITA as dependent variables, and fair employee treatment, and employee compensation to sales as independent variables. Results indicate a negative relationship between employee compensation and firm valuation, and confirm that high leverage firms are more likely to cut-down on employee compensation but ensure better and fair treatment of employees. The result of binary logistic regression model predicts that firm’s dividend policy, employee stock options, and firm leverage positively impact the probability of fair employee treatment.
- Titman, S. (1984) The Effect of Capital Structure on a Firm’s Liquidation Decision. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90035-7
- Hanka, G. (1998) Debt and the Terms of Employment. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 245-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00012-9
- Fenn, G. and Liang, N. (2001) Corporate Financial Policy and Managerial Stock Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00039-3
- Babenko, I. (2009) Share Repurchases and Pay Performance Sensitivity of Employee Compensation Contracts. The Journal of Finance, 64, 117-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01430.x
- Jensen, M. (1986) Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76, 323-329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789
- Barney, J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
- Barney, J. (1995) Resource Based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten Year Retrospective on the Resource Based View. Journal of Management, 27, 643-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700602
- Huselid, M. (1995) The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635-872.
- Sels, et al. (2003) How HRM Affects Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Belgian SMEs. Working Paper Steupunt OOI: 2003. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/34551680.pdf
- Collins, C., Ericksen, J. and Allen, M. (2005) Employee Outcomes: Human Resource Management Practices and Firm Performance in Small Businesses. CAHRS Working Paper #08-09, Ithaca. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp/485
- Subramaniam, M. and Youndt, M. (2005) The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 450-463. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407911
- Soon, A. (2005) Studies on the Impact of Work-Life Initiatives on the Employee and Firm Performance. Executive Report for Public Release. http://www.tafep.sg/sites/default/files/studies_on_Work-Life_initiatives.pdf
- Best, R. (2008) Employee Satisfaction, Firm Value and Firm Productivity. Working Papers from University of Central Missouri, Department of Economics & Finance. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:umn:wpaper:0806