Tax Competition and Strategic Delegation with Interregional Asymmetries in Capital Endowment and Income Inequality
- 1 Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Abstract
This study examines a two-country tax competition model, in which the capital endowment and income inequality are asymmetric in each country. Hwang and Cheo [1] and Peralta and van Ypersele [2] show that when countries differ in capital endowments, the country with the higher capital endowment sets a lower capital tax rate. However, their studies assume that all inhabitants are homogeneous. We extend the models of the two aforementioned studies and conduct an analysis taking into account the asymmetry in income inequality within countries. The tax rate is set by the policy maker elected by majority voting in each country’s election. We find that a higher tax rate may be set in the country with higher capital endowment under certain conditions. Further, if the income inequality is sufficiently large, the median voters in each country unambiguously delegate the right to decide the tax rate to residents who prefer a higher tax rate than their own, regardless of the capital endowments of the two countries.
- Hwang, H. and Cheo, B. (1995) Distribution of Factor Endowments and Tax Competition. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 655-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02086-A
- Peralta, S. and van Ypersele, T. (2005) Factor Endowments and Welfare Levels in an Asymmetric Tax Competition Game. Journal of Urban Economics, 57, 258-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.10.007
- OECD (2014) Focus on Top Incomes and Taxation in OECD Countries: Was the Crisis a Game Changer?
- Baldwin, R.E. and Krugman, P. (2004) Agglomeration, Integration and Tax Harmonisation. European Economic Review, 48, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00318-5
- Bucovetsky, S. (1991) Asymmetric Tax Competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 30, 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(91)90034-5
- Wilson, J.D. (1991) Tax Competition with Interregional Differences in Factor Endowments. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21, 423-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90066-V
- Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1992) The Politics of 1992: Fiscal Policy and European Integration. The Review of Economic Studies, 59, 689-701. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297993
- Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1994) Representative Democracy and Capital Taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 55, 5370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)90080-9
- Ihori, T. and Yang, C.C. (2009) Interregional Tax Competition and Intraregional Political Competition: The Optimal Provision of Public Goods under Representative Democracy. Journal of Urban Economics, 66, 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.08.001
- Borck, R. (2003) Tax Competition and the Choice of Tax Structure in a Majority Voting Model. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00037-8
- Fuest, C. and Huber, B. (2001) Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in a Median Voter Model. Public Choice, 107, 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010308526469
- Osborne, M.J. and Slivinski, A. (1996) A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 65-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946658
- Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1997) An Economic Model of Representative Democracy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 85-114. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555136
- Wilson, J.D. (1986) A Theory of Interregional Tax Competition. Journal of urban Economics, 19, 296-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(86)90045-8