An Economic Instrument to Improve Communities
- 1 LundaHydro AB, Borgholm, Sweden
- 2 Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
Abstract
A general strive exists for achieving the wanted results with as limited resources as possible. There is a need for ever more cost-effective organisations, making this paper required to improve the policy efficiency and raise the technological standard in various communities. The launched economic instrument also improves the ecological footprint of the organisations in question. The Naturally Optimised Revenue Demand in Communities (NORDIC) model is introduced to improve the flow of physical and immaterial utilities through entities of different kinds, such as producing companies and nations. The basis for the work is the existing Efficient Use of Resources for Optimal Production Economy (EUROPE) model, which is developed to become more powerful. Constructed shadow costs are added to the bookkeeping systems of organisations to give economic incentives to improve the economy, technology and environment. The method provides a single key indicator to improve performance. A manual for the practical use of the NORDIC model is presented. The case study shows how to induce an economic incentive to reduce the costs and increase the efficiency for the health care, education and social services in the nation of Sweden. The model shows utility for various entities, such as public sectors, within nations. Citizens get a better life, and improved health, due to a better economy when the results in this paper are implemented.
- Stenis, J. (2005) Construction Waste Management Based on Industrial Management Models: A Swedish Case Study. Waste Management & Research, 23, 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X05050184
- Stenis, J. (2005) Environmental Optimization in Fractionating Industrial Wastes Using Contribution Margin Analysis as a Sustainable Development Tool. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7, 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-004-2377-z
- Stenis, J. and Hogland, W. (2011) Optimization of Mining by Application of the Equality Principle. Resources Policy, 36, 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.05.004
- Stenis, J. and Hogland, W. (2014) Economic Optimization of Landfill Mining. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 40, 389-398. https://doi.org/10.5276/JSWTM.2014.389
- Stenis, J. and Hogland, W. (2016) Cost-Effectiveness of Recycling and Recirculation of Natural and Energy Resources Based on the Equality Principle. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18, 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9627-0
- Stenis, J. and Hogland, W. (2018) Guidelines for Practical Application of the Europe Model to Improve Production Units’ Resource Efficiency. The Open Waste Management Journal, 11, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.2174/1876400201811010041 https://openwastemanagementjournal.com/VOLUME/11/PAGE/41/FULLTEXT
- Wikipedia (2019) Shadow Price. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_price
- Sekerka, L. and Stimel, D. (2012) Environmental Sustainability Decision-Making: Clearing a Path to Change. Journal of Public Affairs, 12, 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1433
- Ooi, G.L. (2007) Urbanization in Southeast Asia: Assessing Policy Process and Progress toward Sustainability. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1246
- Blake, D. (2001) Contextual Effects on Environmental Attitudes and Behaviour. Environment & Behaviour, 33, 708-725. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973205
- Huang, J., Liu, Y., Ma, L. and Su, F. (2013) Methodology for the Assessment and Classification of Regional Vulnerability to Natural Hazards in China: The Application of a DEA Model. Natural Hazards, 65, 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0348-5
- Hills, P. (2005) Environmental Reform, Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process in Hong Kong: An Exploratory Study of Stakeholder Perspectives. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48, 209-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964056042000338154