Is the Socio-Economic Status of the Households below Poverty Line a Key Indicator towards the Choice of Cooking Fuel as LPG?
- 1 Xavier School of Human Resource Management, Xavier University, Bhubaneswar, India
- 2 Indian Institute of Management, Raipur, India
Abstract
This study explores the factors that make an impact on the choice of cooking fuel, in our case, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) among the urban poor in the smart city, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. In earlier studies, multiple socio-economic and market-related factors (e.g. distribution and pricing), are discussed as determinants which ultimately determine the households cooking fuel choice. This study focuses on household characteristics that can impact the choice of cooking fuel. Primary data collection was carried out in 3036 households in three urban-slums of Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India and was used as a sample for the study. The analysis revealed that along with income and socioeconomic status, other household characteristics are also important in determining the choice of cooking fuel. A major finding of the study is that unaffordability is not the only criteria in the choice of cooking fuel. The choice of cooking fuel of a family is basically a function of external and household specific factors.
- IEA (International Energy Agency) (2004) World Energy Outlook 2004. International Energy Agency, Paris.
- Foell, W., Pachauri, S., Spreng, D. and Zerrffi, H. (2011) Household Cooking Fuels and Technologies in Developing Economies. Energy Policy, 39, 7487-7498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.016
- Jain, A., Agrawal, S. and Ganesan, K. (2014) Rationalizing Subsidies, Reaching the Underserved. Council of Energy, Environment and Water, New Delhi.
- IEA (International Energy Agency) (2010) World Energy Outlook 2004. International Energy Agency, Paris.
- IEA (International Energy Agency) (2011) Energy for All-Financing Access for the Poor. IEA, Paris, France.
- Sinha, C.S., Sinha, S. and Joshi, V. (1998) Energy Use in the Rural Areas of India: Setting up a Rural Energy Data Base. Biomass & Bioenergy, 14, 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10059-9
- Gould, C.F. and Urpelainen, J. (2018) LPG as a Clean Cooking Fuel: Adoption, Use and Impact in Rural India. Energy Policy, 122, 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042
- Leach, G. (1992) The Energy Transitions. Energy Policy, 20, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(92)90105-B
- Masera, O., Saatkanp, B. and Kammen, D. (2000) From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model. World Development, 28, 2083-2103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00076-0
- Heltberg, R. (2004) Fuel Switching: Evidence from Eight Developing Countries. Energy Economics, 26, 869-887.
- Heltberg, R. (2005) Factors Determining Household Fuel Choice in Guatemala. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 337-361.
- Gundimeda, H. and Kohlin, G. (2008) Fuel Demand Elasticities for Energy and Environmental Policies: Indian Sample Survey Evidence. Energy Economics, 30, 517-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.10.014
- Barnes, D.F., Krutilla, K. and Hyde, W. (2005) The Urban Household Energy Transition: Energy, Poverty, and the Environment in the Developing World. World Bank, Washington DC.
- Pachauri, S. (2004) An Analysis of Cross-Sectional Variations in Total Household Energy Requirements in India Using Micro Survey Data. Energy Policy, 32, 1723-1735. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00162-9
- Alam, M., Sathaye, J. and Barnes, D. (1998) Urban Household Energy Use in India: Efficiency and Policy Implications. Energy Policy, 26, 885-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00008-1