Using a Local Public Good to Attract Representative Creative Class Members: The Inefficient Equilibrium Case
- 1 Department of Economics, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA
- 2 Graduate School of International Service, Sookmyung Women’s University, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Batabyal and Beladi [1] have recently analyzed a model of competition between two cities that use a local public good (LPG) to attract members of the creative class. The creative class consists of artists and engineers and they study the behavior of a representative artist and an engineer. In this note, we explore three implications of the use of this “representative artist and engineer” modeling strategy. First, we show that the use of such a strategy can lead one to study an inefficient equilibrium in the aggregate economy. Second, we point out that in this inefficient equilibrium, the beliefs of the representative artist and the engineer are inconsistent. Finally, we contend that if we depart from the “representative artist and engineer” construct and focus instead on the entire creative class population which we model as a continuum , then the inefficient equilibrium mentioned above can be turned into an efficient equilibrium.
- Batabyal, A.A. and Beladi, H. (2019) On the Existence of an Equilibrium in Models of Local Public Good Use by Cities to Attract the Creative Class. Unpublished Manuscript, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY.
- Florida, R. (2002) The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books, New York.
- Florida, R. (2003) Cities and the Creative Class. City and Community, 2, 3-19.
- Florida, R. (2005) The Flight of the Creative Class. Harper Business, New York.
- Florida, R. (2008) Who’s Your City? Basic Books, New York.
- Florida, R. (2014) The Creative Class and Economic Development. Economic Development Quarterly, 28, 196-205.
- Florida, R., Adler, P. and Mellander, C. (2017) The City as Innovation Machine. Regional Studies, 51, 86-96.
- Porter, A. and Batabyal, A.A. (2016) Physical Capital Mobility, the Educational and Quality Aspects of Creative Capital and Output Production. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 8, 167-175.
- Buettner, T. and Janeba, E. (2016) City Competition for the Creative Class. Journal of Cultural Economics, 40, 413-451.
- Batabyal, A.A., Kourtit, K. and Nijkamp, P. (2019) Using Local Public Goods to Attract and Retain the Creative Class: A Tale of Two Cities. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 11, 571-581.
- Hansen, H.K. and Niedomysl, T. (2009) Migration of the Creative Class: Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 191-206.
- Richardson, K.E. (2009) What Lures and Retains the International Creative-Class Family? A Case Study of the Family Unit found in Vancouver’s Biotechnology Sector. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 7, 323-345.
- Audretsch, D.B. and Belitski, M. (2013) The Missing Pillar: The Creativity Theory of Knowledge Spillover Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41, 819-836.
- Batabyal, A.A. and Beladi, H. (2018) Artists, Engineers and Aspects of Economic Growth in a Creative Region. Economic Modelling, 71, 214-219.
- Bewley, T.F. (1981) A Critique of Tiebout’s Theory of Local Public Expenditures. Econometrica, 49, 713-740.
- Krugman, P.R., Obstfeld, M. and Melitz, M.J. (2015) International Economics. 10th Edition, Pearson, Boston, MA.