Why Does an Auditor Not Issue a Going Concern Opinion for a Failing Company? Impact of Financial Risk, Time to Bankruptcy, and Cognitive Style — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Why Does an Auditor Not Issue a Going Concern Opinion for a Failing Company? Impact of Financial Risk, Time to Bankruptcy, and Cognitive Style
ACA Research Group, Faculty of Business Studies, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland
,
ACA Research Group, Faculty of Business Studies, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland
1 ACA Research Group, Faculty of Business Studies, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland
2 ACA Research Group, Faculty of Business Studies, University of Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland
This study investigates the effects of client’s financial risk, time to bankruptcy, and auditor’s cognitive style on issuing a Going Concern Opinion (GCO) for failing companies. Empirical tests are based on financial data from 328 bankrupt firms and peer review data from 172 auditors. Cognitive style on an intuitive - analytic dimension is approximated by the degree of auditor’s compliance with the ISA standards for analytic procedures in peer review. Empirical findings support research hypotheses and show that seriousness of the financial risk and time distance to bankruptcy are important determinants of GC judgment accuracy. They also show that the performance of the cognitive style of the auditor is related to the fit between the cognitive style and the characteristics of the GC situation. The results indicate that an auditor’s individual characteristics, i.e. cognitive style, affect his/her decision making when issuing GCO. This study is the first approach that systematically investigates the relationship between financial risk, distance to bankruptcy, and cognitive style on GC judgment in an archival research.
KeywordsGoing Concern OpinionFailing FirmsFinancial RiskTime to BankruptcyCognitive StyleFinnish Small Firms
Bellovary, J.L., Ciacomino, D.W. and Akers, M.D. (2007) A Review of Going Concern Prediction Studies: 1976 to Present. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 5, 9-28. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v5i5.2541
Gissel, J.L., Robertson, J.C. and Stefaniak, C.M. (2010) Formation and Consequences of Going Concern Opinions: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29, 59-141.
Carson, E., Fargher, N.L., Geiger, M.A., Lennox, C., Raghunandan, K. and Willekens, M. (2013) Audit Reporting for Going-Concern Uncertainty: A Research Synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32, 353-384. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50324
Louwers, T.J. (1998) The Relationship between Going-Concern Opinions and the Auditor’s Loss Function. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491325
Libby, R. and Frederick, D.M. (1990) Experience and the Ability to Explain Audit Findings. Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 348-367. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491154
Abdolmohammadi, M. and Wright, A. (1987) An Examination of the Effects of Experience and Task Complexity on Audit Judgments. The Accounting Review, 62, 1-13.
Bonner, S.E. (1994) A Model of the Effects of Audit Task Complexity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19, 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90033-7
Bonner, S.E. (2008) Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Fuller, L.R. and Kaplan, S.E. (2004) A Note about the Effect of Auditor Cognitive Style on Task Performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 16, 131-143. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2004.16.1.131
Chan, D. (1996) Cognitive Misfit of Problem-Solving Style at Work: A Facet of Person-Organization Fit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 194-207. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0099
Menon, K. and Schwartz, K. (1987) An Empirical Investigation of Audit Qualification Decisions in the Presence of Going Concern Uncertainties. Contemporary Accounting Research, 3, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1987.tb00640.x
Koh, H.C. and Killough, L.N. (1990) The Use of Multiple Discriminant Analysis in the Assessment of the Going-Concern Status of an Audit Client. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 17, 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1990.tb00556.x
Altman, E.I. and McGough, T. (1974) Evaluation of a Company as a Going Concern. Journal of Accountancy, 138, 50-57.
Mutchler, J.F. (1985) A Multivariate Analysis of the Auditor’s Going-Concern Opinion Decision. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 668-682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490832
Geiger, M.A. and Raghunandan, K. (2002) Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 21, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.67
LaSalle, R. and Anandarajan, A. (1996) Auditors’ Views on the Type of Audit Report Issued to Entities with Going Concern Uncertainties. Accounting Horizons, 10, 51-72.
Asare, S.K. (1990) The Auditor’s Going Concern Decision: A Review and Implications for Future Research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 9, 39-64.
Bell, T.B. and Tabor, R.H. (1991) Empirical Analysis of Audit Uncertainty Qualifications. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 350-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491053
Koh, H.C. (1991) Model Predictions and Auditor Assessments of Going Concern Status. Accounting and Business Research, 21, 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1991.9729848
Behn, B.K., Kaplan, S.E. and Krumwiede, K.R. (2001) Further Evidence on the Auditors’ Going Concern Report: The Influence of Management Plans. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20, 13-29. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2001.20.1.13
Riley, R., Behn, B.K. and Pany, K. (2000) Management Plans and SAS No. 59 Going Concern Resolutions. Advances in Accounting, 17, 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6110(00)17011-7
Biggs, S.F., Selfridge, M. and Krupka, G.R. (1993) A Computational Model of Auditor Knowledge and Reasoning Processes in the Going-Concern Judgment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 12, 82-99.
Arnold, V., Collier, P.A., Leech, S.A. and Sutton, S.G. (2001) The Impact of Political Pressure on Novice Decision Makers: Are Auditors Qualified to Make Going Concern Judgments? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2000.0442
Choo, F. (1996) Auditors’ Knowledge Content and Judgment Performance: A Cognitive Script Approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 339-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(95)00048-8
Reichelt, K.J. and Wang, D. (2010) National and Office-Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48, 647-686. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00363.x
Lehmann, C.M. and Norman, C.S. (2006) The Effects of Experience on Complex Problem Representation and Judgment in Auditing: An Experimental Investigation. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, 65-83. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2006.18.1.65
Joe, J.R. (2003) Why Press Coverage of a Client Influences the Audit Opinion. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 109-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00098
Firth, M., Mo, P. and Wong, R. (2012) Auditors’ Organizational Form, Legal Liability and Reporting Conservatism: Evidence from China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29, 57-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01081.x
Favere-Marchesi, M. (2006) “Order Effects” Revisited: The Importance of Chronology. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 25, 69-83. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2006.25.1.69
Guiral, A. and Esteo, F. (2006) Are Spanish Auditors Skeptical in Going Concern Evaluations? Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, 598-620. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610674889
Ashton, R.H. and Kennedy, J. (2002) Eliminating Recency with Self Review: The Case of Auditors “Going Concern” Judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.412
Laitinen, E.K. (1991) Financial Ratios and Different Failure Processes. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 18, 649-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1991.tb00231.x
D’Aveni, R. (1989) The Aftermath of Organizational Decline: A Longitudinal Study of the Strategic and Managerial Characteristics of Declining Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 577-605. https://doi.org/10.2307/256435
Sormunen, N. and Laitinen, T. (2012) Late Financial Distress Process Stages and Financial Ratios: Evidence for Auditors’ Going Concern Evaluation. Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 1, 41-69.
Ho, J.L. and Rodgers, W. (1993) A Review of Accounting Research on Cognitive Characteristics. Journal of Accounting Literature, 12, 101-130.
Myers, I. and McCaulley, M. (1985) Manual a Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Palo Alto.
Altman, E.I., Sabato, G. and Wilson, N. (2010) The Value of Non-Financial Information in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Risk Management. The Journal of Credit Risk, 6, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.21314/JCR.2010.110
Laitinen, T. and Laitinen, E.K. (2014) Yrityksen maksukyky—Arviointi ja ennakointi. KHT-media. Helsinki. Printed by Bookwell Oy. Porvoo. (In Finnish)