Do Productivity Shocks in the United States Matter to Components of Nigeria’s External Sector?
- 1 Department of Economic Development and Social Studies, National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies, National As-sembly, Abuja, Nigeria
- 2 Department of Banking and Finance, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Nigeria
- 3 Department of Banking and Finance, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Nigeria
Abstract
The paper examines the effects of United States productivity shock on components of Nigeria’s external sector. Using a structural Macroeconomic Model (SMM), the paper modelled Nigeria’s external sector by using ten behavioural equations and four identities. The SMM was simulated, using a 3% increase and 3% decrease in US productivity to elicit responses of Nigeria’s external sector components to this shock. Using quarterly data from 1981 to 2015, the paper found that both positive and negative US productivity shocks elicited symmetrical responses from Nigeria’s external sector components. Also, both positive and negative shocks had little effects on Nigeria’s current account balance, imports, exports, foreign direct investments and reserves. However, positive shocks increased remittances inflow, a depreciation in nominal exchange rates, a reduction in foreign portfolio investment position, and a reduction in foreign debt flows. The responses for a negative US productivity shock w ere just the direct opposite of a positive shock. Our finding shows that, the components of Nigeria’s external sector will respond in like manner to both positive and negative shocks to United States productivity.
- Imoisi, A.I. (2012) Trends in Nigeria’s Balance of Payments: An Empirical Analysis from 1970-2010. European Journal of Business and Management, 4, 210-217.
- Yilmaz, O. and Akinci, M. (2011) Current Account and Economic Growth Relationship between Balance Sheet: The Case of Turkey. Ataturk University Social Journal of the Institute of Science, 15, 363-377.
- Telatar, O.M. and Terzi, A. (2009) Turkey in the Economic Growth and Current Account Balance Relationship. Ataturk University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences School Journal, 23, 119-134.
- Garnaut, R., Song, L. and Woo, W.T. (2009) China’s New Place in a World in Crisis: Economic Geopolitical and Environmental Dimensions. Australian National University E-Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CNPWC.07.2009
- Henriksen, E.R. (2005) A Demographic Explanation of U.S. and Japanese Current Account Behaviour.
- Fausten, D.K. (2009) Macroeconomic Policy and the External Sector. In: International Economics, Finance and Trade, Vol. 1, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), 195.
- IMF (2003) Fund Assistance for Countries Facing Exogenous Shocks. SM/03/288. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498329170.007
- Central Bank of Nigeria (2013) Modelling the External Sector of the Nigerian Economy. Research Department, Abuja.
- Bhanumurthy, N.R., Bose, S. and Swayamsiddha, P. (2014) Modelling India’s External Sector: Review and Some Empirics. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, Working Paper, No. 2014-138.
- Bsharat, M. (2014) The Effect of Exogenous Factors on the Performance of External Sector in Palestine: A VECM Approach. Palestine Monetary Authority Working Paper.
- NERI (2014) Lao PDR’s Macroeconomic Model. The Technical Background Paper, 2nd Edition.
- Gurara, D.Z. (2013) A Macroeconometric Model for Rwanda. ADB Working Paper Series, No. 177.
- Akanbi, O.A. and Du Toit, C.B. (2010) Macroeconometric Modelling for the Nigerian Economy: A Growth Poverty Gap Analysis. Economic Modelling, 28, 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2010/08/015
- Karnik, A. and Fernandes, C. (2005) Macroeconometric Modelling for an Oil Development Economy: An Instruments Targets Approach for the UAE Economy. Economic Research Forum Annual Conference, Cairo, March 2005.
- Livermore, S. (2005) An Econometric Model of the Slovak Republic. World Bank Public Finance Management Reform Project.