Generative AI as a Strategic Enabler for Global Start-Ups Entering Southeast Asian Markets: Capabilities, Illustrative Cases, and a Proof-of-Concept Framework
- 1 Buckinghamshire New University, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly used by technology start-ups to reduce the cost, time, and organizational complexity of entering culturally and institutionally diverse markets. Southeast Asia is a particularly relevant context because it combines rapid digital adoption with high cross-country variation in language, culture, logistics, and regulation. This paper positions GenAI not only as an operational automation tool, but as a strategic enabler that can reshape internationalization choices by accelerating market learning, lowering the liability of foreignness, and enabling rapid, scalable localization across business functions. The study is conceptual: it synthesizes GenAI capability literature with established market-entry theories (e.g., CAGE distance, the Uppsala learning process, and dynamic capabilities) and uses four illustrative cases (Indonesia, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Singapore) drawn from publicly available secondary sources. Building on this synthesis, the paper proposes a GenAI-enabled market-entry framework and presents a proof-of-concept (PoC) simulation for a hypothetical e-commerce start-up entering Thailand. The PoC results reported in Section 7 are projected outcomes of a hypothetical scenario (not empirical findings) and are intended to illustrate how GenAI could change time-to-market and localization costs relative to a resource-backed organization (RBO), defined here as an established incumbent with dedicated localization and market-entry resources.
- ASEAN Secretariat (2022). ASEAN Digital Masterplan 2025 . ASEAN.
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
- Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N. et al. (2020). Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners. Advances in Neural Information Proc essing Systems , 33, 1877-1901.
- Elahi, B. Z. (2023). Ethics of Generative Models. AI & Law Journal, 31, 15-33.
- Estevez, M., Ballestar, M. T., & Sainz, J. (2025). Market Research and Knowledge Using Generative AI: The Power of Large Language Models. Journal of Innovation & Know ledge, 10, Article 100796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100796
- Fitriani, W., Nasution, M. I., & Supratikta, H. (2024). Digitalization of Companies Prospects for Process Automation Using RPA and GPT Integration. Indonesian Dev elopment of Economics and Administration Journal, 3, 44-54. https://doi.org/10.70001/idea.v3i1.209
- Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance Still Matters: The Hard Reality of Global Expansion. Har vard Business Review, 79, 137-147.
- Gupta, A. I. (2022). Automated Competitor Tracking Using NLP. IEEE Access, 10, 45200-45212.
- Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676
- Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala Internationalization Process Model Revisited: From Liability of Foreignness to Liability of Outsidership. Journal of Inte rnational Business Studies, 40, 1411-1431. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24
- Lee, J. K. (2023). Generative AI in Southeast Asian Localization. AI & Society, 39, 122-140.
- Liu, M., & Chang, J. (2024). Sentiment-Aware Design Using Generative AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39, 34-50.
- Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a Theory of International New Ventures. Journ al of International Business Studies, 25, 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193
- Reuters (2025). Singapore’s Carro eyes M&A, Australia Foray Ahead of Potential Dual Listing. Reuters .
- Roche, C., Wall, P. J., & Lewis, D. (2023). Ethics and Diversity in Artificial Intelligence Policies, Strategies and Initiatives. AI and Ethics, 3, 1095-1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00218-9