Central Force Optimization with Gravity < 0, Elitism, and Dynamic Threshold Optimization: An Antenna Application, 6-Element Yagi-Uda Arrays
- 1 Consulting Engineer & Registered Patent Attorney of Counsel, Emeritus Cataldo & Fisher, LLC Woburn, MA, USA
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of adding three extensions to Central Force Optimization when it is used as the Global Search and Optimization method for the design and optimization of 6-elementYagi-Uda arrays. Those exten sions are Negative Gravity , Elitism , and Dynamic Threshold Optimization . T he basic CFO heuristic does not include any of these, but adding them substan tially improves the algorithm’s performance. This paper extends the work r eported in a previous paper that considered only negative gravity and which showed a significant performance improvement over a range of optimized a rrays. Still better results are obtained by adding to the mix Elitism and DTO . An overall improvement in best fitness of 19.16% is achieved by doing so. While the work reported here was limited to the design/optimization of 6- element Yagis, the reasonable inference based on these data is that any antenna design/optimization problem, indeed any Global Search and Optimiza tion problem, antenna or not, utilizing Central Force Optimization as the Gl obal Search and Optimization engine will benefit by including all three extensions, probably substantially.
- Formato, R.A. (2021) Six-Element Yagi Array Designs Using Central Force Optimization with Pseudo Random Negative Gravity. Wireless Engineering and Technology, 12, 23-51. https://doi.org/10.4236/wet.2021.123003
- Luke, S. (2015) Essentials of Metaheuristics. 2nd Edition, Online Ver. 2.2, Oct. 2015, Sect. 3.3.1. https://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/book/metaheuristics/
- Formato, R.A. (2012) Dynamic Threshold Optimization—A New Approach? http://arXiv.org/abs/1206.0414
- Formato, R.A. (2013) Issues in Antenna Optimization—A Monopole Case Study. ACES (Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society) Journal, 28, 1122-1133.
- Formato, R.A. (2017) Determinism in Electromagnetic Design & Optimization— Part II: BBP-Derived π Fractions for Generating Uniformly Distributed Sampling Points in Global Search and Optimization Algorithms. Forum for Electromagnetic Research Methods and Application Technologies. Vol. 19, Article No. 10, https://www.e-fermat.org
- Formato, R.A. (2017) Determinism in Electromagnetic Design & Optimization— Part I: Central Force Optimization. FERMAT, Forum for Electromagnetic Research Methods and Application Technologies. Vol. 19, Article No. 9. https://www.e-fermat.org
- Dib, N., Sharaqa, A. and Formato, R.A. (2013) Variable Z0 Applied to the Optimal Design of Multi-Stub Matching Network and a Meander Monopole. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, 6, 55-514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1759078713001049
- U.S. Patent No. 8776002. https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair
- Burke, G.J. (2011) Numerical Electromagnetics Code—NEC-4.2 Method of Moments, Part I: User’s Manual. LLNL-SM-490875, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (USA), Livermore, CA, 2011.
- Wang, J. (2011) Particle Swarm Optimization with Adaptive Parameter Control and Opposition. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 7, 4463-4470
- Formato, R.A. (2010) Parameter-Free Deterministic Global Search with Simplified Central Force Optimization. In: Huang, D.-S., Zhao, Z., Bevilacqua, V. and Figueroa, J.C., Eds., Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications (ICIC2010), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 309-318, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14922-1_39
- Hayes, B. (2011) Quasirandom Ramblings. American Scientist, 99, 282-287. https://doi.org/10.1511/2011.91.282 https://www.americanscientist.org/ http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.365.4074&rep=rep1&type=pdf