Degenerate States in Nonlinear Sigma Model with U(1) Symmetry<br/><br/><sub>—For Study on Violation of Cluster Property</sub> — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Degenerate States in Nonlinear Sigma Model with U(1) Symmetry<br/><br/><sub>—For Study on Violation of Cluster Property</sub>
Faculty of Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Japan
1 Faculty of Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Japan
Entanglement in quantum theory is a concept that has confused many scientists. This concept implies that the cluster property, which means no relations between sufficiently separated two events, is non-trivial. In the works for some quantum spin systems, which have been recently published by the author, extensive and quantitative examinations were made about the violation of cluster property in the correlation function of the spin operator. The previous study of these quantum antiferromagnets showed that this violation is induced by the degenerate states in the systems where the continuous symmetry spontaneously breaks. Since this breaking is found in many materials such as the high temperature superconductors and the superfluidity, it is an important question whether we can observe the violation of the cluster property in them. As a step to answer this question we study a quantum nonlinear sigma model with U(1) symmetry in this paper. It is well known that this model, which has been derived as an effective model of the quantum spin systems, can also be applied to investigations of many materials. Notifying that the existence of the degenerate states is essential for the violation, we made numerical calculations in addition to theoretical arguments to find these states in the nonlinear sigma model. Then, successfully finding the degenerate states in the model, we came to a conclusion that there is a chance to observe the violation of cluster property in many materials to which the nonlinear sigma model applies.
KeywordsQuantum Nonlinear Sigma ModelU(1) SymmetryCluster PropertySpontaneous Symmetry BreakingDegenerate States
Bell, J.S. (1964) On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1, 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195
Kochen, S. and Specker, E.P. (1967) The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59-87. https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1968.17.17004
Hardy, L. (1993) Nonlocality of Two Particles without Inequalities for Almost All Entangled States. Physics Review Letters, 71, 1665-1668. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1665
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M. and Horodecki, K. (2003) Quantum Entanglement. Review of Modern Physics, 81, 865-942. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
’t Hooft, G. (2006) The Mathematical Basis for Deterministic Quantum Mechanics. In: Nieuwenhuizen, T.M., Mehmani, B., Špička, V., Aghdami, M.J. and Khrennikov, A.Y., Eds., Beyond the Quantum, World Scientific, Singapore, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812771186_0001
Gühne, O. and Tóth, G. (2009) Entanglement Detection. Physics Reports, 474, 1-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004
Ekert, A., Alves, C., Oi, D., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P. and Kwek, L. (2002) Direct Estimations of Linear and Nonlinear Functionals of a Quantum State. Physical Review Letters, 88, Article ID: 217901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.217901
Napoli, C., Bromley, T.R., Cianciaruso, M., Piani, M., Johnston, N. and Adesso, G. (2016) Robustness of Coherence: An Operational and Observable Measure of Quantum Coherence. Physical Review Letters, 116, Article ID: 150502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.150502
Nielsen, M.A. and Chuang, I.L. (2000) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University, Cambridge.
Deutsch, D. (1985) Quantum Theory, the Church-Turing Principle and the Universal Quantum Computer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 400, 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1985.0070
Weinberg, S. (1995) The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 2, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
Strocchi, F. (2008) Symmetry Breaking. Vol. 732, Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73593-9
Dell’Anna, L., Salberger, O., Barbiero, L., Trombettoni, A. and Korepin, V. (2016) Violation of Cluster Decomposition and Absence of Light Cones in Local Integer and Half-Integer Spin Chains. Physical Review B, 94, Article ID: 155140. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155140
Shimizu, A. and Miyadera, T. (2002) Cluster Property and Robustness of Ground States of Interacting Many Bosons. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 71, 56-59. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.71.56
Shimizu, A. and Miyadera, T. (2002) Stability of Quantum States of Finite Macroscopic Systems against Classical Noises. Perturbations from Environments, and Local Measurements, 89, Article ID: 270403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.270403
Xu, S. and Fan, S. (2017) Generalized C Luster Decomposition Principle Illustrated in Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics. Physical Review A, 95, Article ID: 063809. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.063809
Fröhlich, J. and Rodríguez, P. (2017) On Cluster Properties of Classical Ferromagnets in an External Magnetic Field. Journal of Statistical Physics, 166, 828-840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-016-1556-2
Strocchi, F. (1978) Local and Covariant Gauge Quantum Field Theories. Cluster Property, Superselection Rules, and the Infrared Problem. Physics Review D, 17, 2010-2021. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.17.2010
Lowdon, P (2016) Conditions on the Violation of the Cluster Decomposition Property in QCD. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 57, Article ID: 102302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4965715
Munehisa, T. (2018) Violation of Cluster Property in Quantum Antiferromagnet. World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, 8, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcmp.2018.81001
Munehisa, T. (2018) Violation of Cluster Property in Heisenberg Antiferromagnet. World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, 8, 203-229. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcmp.2018.84015
Munehisa, T. (2020) Quantum Curie-Weiss Magnet Induced by Violation of Cluster Property. World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, 10, 27-52. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcmp.2020.102003
Kochmanski, M., Paszkiewicz, T. and Wolski, S. (2013) Curie-Weiss Magnet?—A Simple Model of Phase Transition. European Journal of Physics, 34, Article No. 1555. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/6/1555
Chayes, L., Crawford, N., Ioffe, D. and Levit. A. (2008) The Phase Diagram of the Quantum Curie-Weiss Model. Journal of Statistical Physics, 133, Article No. 131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-008-9608-x
Carneiro, C. and Pellegrino, G. (2018) Analysis of Quantum Phase Transition in Some Different Curie-Weiss Models: A Unified Approach.
Richter, J., Schulenburg, J. and Honecker, A. (2004) Quantum Magnetism in Two Dimensions: From Semi-Classical Néel Order to Magnetic Disorder. In: Schollwöck, U., Richter, J., Farnell, D.J.J. and Bishop, R.F., Eds., Quantum Magnetism, Vol. 645, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 85-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0119592
Manousakis, E (1991) The Spin 1/2 Heisenberg Antiferromagnet on a Square Lattice and Its Application to the Cuprous Oxides. Review Modern of Physics, 63, 1-62. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.63.1
Landee, C. and Turnbull, M. (2013) Recent Developments in Low-Dimensional Copper(II) Molecular Magnets. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2013, 2266-2285. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201390053
Haldane, F. (1983) Nonlinear Field Theory of Large-Spin Heisenberg Antiferromagnets: Semiclassically Quantized Solitons of the One-Dimensional Easy-Axis Néel State. Physical Review Letters, 50, 1153-1156. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1153
Chakravarty, S., Halperin, B, and Nelson, S. (1989) Two-Dimensional Quantum Heisenberg Antiferromagnet at Low Temperatures. Physical Review B, 39, 2344-2371. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.39.2344
Chubukov, A., Sachdev, S. and Ye, J. (1994) Theory of Two-Dimensional Quantum Heisenberg Antiferromagnets with a Nearly Critical Ground State. Physical Review B, 49, 11919-11961. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.11919
Auerbach, A. (1994) Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism. Springer-Verlag, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0869-3
Chen, Y. and Neto, A. (2000) Effective Field Theory for Layered Quantum Antiferromagnets with Nonmagnetic Impurities. Physical Review B, 61, Article No. R3772-R3775. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.R3772
Dupre, T. (1996) Localization Transition in Three Dimensions: Monte Carlo Simulation of a Nonlinear Sigma Model. Physical Review B, 54, 12763-12774. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.12763
Schaefer, L. and Wegner, F. (1980) Disordered System with N Orbitals Per Site: Lagrange Formulation, Hyperbolic Symmetry, and Goldstone Modes. Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter, 38, 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01598751
Bulgadaev, S. (2000) D-Dimensional Conformal Sigma-Models and Their Topological Excitation. arXiv:hep-th/0008017v1.
Alles, B., Borisenko, O. and Papa, A. (2018) Finite Density 2D O(3) Sigma Model: Dualization and Numerical Simulations. Physics Review D, 98, Article ID: 114508. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.114508
Abanov, A. and Wiegmann, P. (2000) Chiral Non-Linear Sigma-Models as Models for Topological Superconductivity.
Scherer, S. (2002) Introduction to Chiral Perturbation Theory.
Schmudgen, K. (1983) On the Heisenberg Commutation Relation. I. Journal of Functional Analysis, 50, 8-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1236(83)90058-7
Albeverio, S. and Sengupta, A. (2016) Complex Phase Space and Weyl’s Commutation Relations. Expositiones Mathematicae, 34, 249-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exmath.2015.12.006
Arai, A. (2016) A Family of Inequivalent Weyl Representations of Canonical Commutation Relations with Applications to Quantum Field Theory. Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 28, Article ID: 1650007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X16500070
Munehisa, T. and Munehisa, Y. (2003) A New Approach to Stochastic State Selections in Quantum Spin Systems. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 72, 2759-2765. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.72.2759
Munehisa, T. and Munehisa, Y. (2004) The Stochastic State Selection Method for Energy Eigenvalues in the Shastry-Sutherland Model. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 73, 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.73.340
Munehisa, T. and Munehisa, Y. (2004) Numerical Study for an Equilibrium in the Recursive Stochastic State Selection Method.
Munehisa, T. and Munehisa, Y. (2004) A Recursive Method of the Stochastic State Selection for Quantum Spin Systems. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 73, 2245-2251. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.73.2245
Munehisa, T. and Munehisa, Y. (2006) The Stochastic State Selection Method Combined with the Lanczos Approach to Eigenvalues in Quantum Spin Systems. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 18, 2327-2335. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/18/7/018
Munehisa, T. and Munehisa, Y. (2007) An Equilibrium for Frustrated Quantum Spin Systems in the Stochastic State Selection Method. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 19, 196202-196220. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/19/196202
Munehisa, T. and Munehisa, Y. (2009) A Constrained Stochastic State Selection Method Applied to Frustrated Quantum Spin Systems. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 21, 236008-236019. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/23/236008
Munehisa, T. and Munehisa, Y. (2010) Numerical Study of the Spin-1/2 Heisenberg Antiferromagnet on a 48-Site Triangular Lattice Using the Stochastic State Selection Method.
Hatano, N. and Suzuki, M. (1993) Quantum Monte Carlo and Related Methods: Recent Developments. In: Suzuki, M., Ed., Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Condensed Matter Physics, World Scientific, Singapore, 13-47. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814503815_0002
De Raedt, H. and von der Linden, W. (1995) The Monte Carlo Method in Condensed Matter Physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 249-284.
Kawashima, N. (2002) Quantum Monte Carlo Methods. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 145, 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.145.138