Comparative Study of the Effect of Shading Rate on the Electrical Parameters of CIGS and CdTe/CdS Solar Modules
- 1 Laboratory of the Semiconductors and Solar Energies (LASES), Physical Department, Science Faculty, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal
- 2 Laboratory of the Semiconductors and Solar Energies (LASES), Physical Department, Science Faculty, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal
- 3 Laboratory of the Semiconductors and Solar Energies (LASES), Physical Department, Science Faculty, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal
- 4 Laboratory of the Semiconductors and Solar Energies (LASES), Physical Department, Science Faculty, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal
- 5 Laboratory of Materials, Energy and System Control (LMECS), Physical Department, Science Faculty of Mohammadia, University Hassan II of Casablanca, Casablanca, Morocco
- 6 Laboratory of the Semiconductors and Solar Energies (LASES), Physical Department, Science Faculty, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Dakar, Senegal
Abstract
In this paper , a comparative study of the maximum power on the shading rate on the maximum power of thin film PV modules. Thus two thin film PV modules of type Copper indium gallium selenide, CIGS, of 90W power and a CdTe (Cadmium telluride)/CdS (Cadmium sulfide) module, of maximum power 75 W. These modules, reference SN-CIGS90 and CX3 75 were tested under the conditions of the installation site to ensure their proper functioning and to determine the initial values of electrical parameters before shading. The results obtained are as follows: for the CIGS: Pm (80.717 W); Vco (23.06 V), Icc (3.5 A) and for the CdTe:Pm (54.914 W); Vco (35.52 V), Icc (1.546 A) . After this characterization test, the modules are exposed to real operating conditions at the Center for Study and Research on the renewable energy (CERER), Cheikh Anta Diop University in Dakar. Four types of shading are performed on each module with the same mask: partial shading at 25%, 50%, 75% and complete shading at 100%. The comparison of the variation rates obtained on the experimental values of the 4 types of shading carried out on each module, shows that, the phenomenon of shading constitutes an environmental factor which influences negatively the maximum power of the thin film PV modules. But this reduction depends on the surface of the shaded module, the nature of the mask but also the technology used. Indeed, for a shading of 25% of the surface of the two modules, we note a reduction of 21.32% of power for the CIGS, against 40.53% for the CdTe/CdS, that is to say a difference which approaches 20%.
- Wohlgemuth, J.H., Cunningham, D.W., Monus, P., Miller J., et al. (2005) Long Term Reliability of PV Modules. Proceeding of 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference, Waikoloa, 7-12 May 2006, 2050-2053. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCPEC.2006.279905
- Mani, M. and Pillai, R. (2010) Impact of Dust on Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Performance: Research Status, Challenges and Recommendations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 3124-3131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.065
- Saidan, M., Albaali, A.G., Alasis, E. and Kaldellis, J.K. (2016) Experimental Study on the Effect of Dust Deposition on Solar Photovoltaic Panels in Desert Environment. Renew Energy, 92, 499-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.031
- Zaihidee, F.M., Mekhilef, S., Seyedmahmoudian, M. and Horan, B. (2016) Dust as an Unalterable Deteriorative factor Affecting PV Panel’s Efficiency: Why and How. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 1267-1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.068
- Nardone, M., Dahal, S. and Waddle, J.M. (2016) Shading-Induced Failure in Thin-Film Photovoltaic Modules: Electrothermal Simulation with Nonuniformities. Solar Energy, 139, 381-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.006
- Lee, J.E., Bae, S., Oh, W., Park, H., Kim, S.M., Lee, D., Nam, J., Mo, C.B., Kim, D., Yang, J., Kang, Y., Lee, H.-S. and Kim, D. (2016) Investigation of Damage Caused by Partial Shading of CuInxGa(1—x)Se2 Photovoltaic Modules with Bypass Diodes. Progress in Photovoltaics, 24, 1035-1043. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2738
- Puttnins, S., Jander, S., Wehrmann, A., Benndorf, G., Stlzel, M., Mller, A., von Wenckstern, H., Daume, F., Rahm, A. and Grundmann, M. (2014) Breakdown Characteristics of Flexible Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 120, 506-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.031
- Szaniawski, P., Lindahl, J., Trndahl, T., Zimmermann, U. and Edoff, M. (2013) Light-Enhanced Reverse Breakdown in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells. Thin Solid Films, 535, 326-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2012.09.022
- Dongaonkar, S., Deline, C. and Alam, M.A. (2013) Performance and Reliability Implications of Two-Dimensional Shading in Monolithic Thin-Film Photovoltaic Modules. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 3, 1367-1375. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2270349
- Miyazaki, H., Mikami, R., Akira, Y. and Konogai, M. (2003) Cu(InGa)Se2 Thin Film Absorber with High Ga Contents and Its Application to the Solar Cells. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 64, 2055-2058. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(03)00204-X