Reciprocity Relation between the Mass Constituents of the Universe and Hardy’s Quantum Entanglement Probability
- 1 Materials Science and Crystallography, Technical University of Clausthal, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Lower Saxony, Germany
Abstract
In this short contribution, a reciprocity relation between mass constituents of the universe was explained governed by Hardy ’s maximum entanglement probability of φ 5 = 0.09017. While well explainable through a set-theoretical argumentation, the relation may also be a consequence of a coupling factor attributed to the normed dimensions of the universe. Also, very simple expressions for the mass amounts were obtained, when replacing the Golden Mean φ by the Archimedes ’ constant π . A brief statement was devoted to the similarity between the E-Infinity Theory of El Naschie and the Information Relativity Theory of Suleiman . In addition, superconductivity was also linked with Hardy ’s entanglement probability.
- Mermin, N.D. (1994) Quantum Mysteries Refined. American Journal of Physics, 62, 880-887. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17733
- Hardy, L. (1993) Nonlocality for Two Particles without Inequalities for Almost All Entangled States. Physical Review Letters, 71, 1665-1668. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1665
- El Naschie, M.S. (2013) Quantum Entanglement: Where Dark Energy and Negative Gravity plus Accelerated Expansion of the Universe Comes from. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 3, 57-77. https://doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2013.32011
- Otto, H.H. (2018) Mass Constituents of a Flat Lattice Multiverse: Conclusion from Similarity between Two Universal Numbers, the Rocksalt-Type 2D Madelung Constant and the Golden Mean. Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.91001
- El Naschie, M.S. (2004) A Review of E-Infinity and the Mass Spectrum of High Energy Particle Physics. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 19, 209-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00278-9
- Suleiman, R. (2017) Dark Matter and Dark Energy as Quantum Entities. Researchgate. Working Paper, 1-12.
- De Broglie, L. (1923) Waves and Quanta. Nature, 112, 540. https://doi.org/10.1038/112540a0
- Bohm, D. (1952) A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables. I. Physical Review, 85, 166-179. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.166
- Bohm, D. (1952) A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables. II. Physical Review, 85, 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.85.180
- Mermin, D. (1998) The Ithaca Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Pramana, 51, 549-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02827447
- El Naschie, M.S. (2017) From a Dual Einstein-Kaluza Spacetime to ‘tHooft Renormalon and the Reality of Accelerated Cosmic Expansion. Journal of Modern Physics, 8, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2017.88085
- El Naschie, M.S., Olsen, S., Helal, M.A., Marek-Crnjak, L. and Nada, S. (2018) On the Missing Link between Cosmology and Biology. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics, 6, 11-13.
- He, J.H. (2010) A Note on Elementary Cobordism and Negative Space. International Journal of Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulations, 11, 1093-1095. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2010.11.12.1093
- Marek-Crnjac, L. (2011) The Hausdorff Dimension of the Penrose Universe. Physics Research International, 2011, Article ID 874302. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/874302