Study of the Translocation and Distribution of Cadmium into Bean Plants (Phaseolus vulgaris) Using Labelled Cd-109
- 1 Institute of Industrial Safety and Environment, University of Batna, Batna, Algeria
- 2 Faculty of Sciences, University of Annaba, Annaba, Algeria
Abstract
The motivation of this work was dictated by a concern of using bioaccumulative plant species likely to be used in the technique of bioindication. The obtained results and discussions proposed are approaches of chemist, because the mechanisms of the effect of cadmium on the various plant cells have been widely developed by several biologists. The use of labeled cadmium is important to study the uptake, the translocation and the metabolism at very low levels of this element in plants. Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), the model chosen for the investigation, was cultivated in vermiculite for 12 days. After this period, plants were transferred into 100 ml flasks containing nutrient solution and radioactive Cd-109 (γ, t1/2 = 461.3 days) with variable activity of: 0.05, 0.1 and 1.0 micro Currie (μCi). Samples were transferred to a growth room and left for periods of 4 and 7 days, then analyzed by the solid scintillation method. The counting was carried out for roots, stems and leaves.
- M. F. L’Annunziata, “Radiotracers in Agricultural Chemistry,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1979.
- J. J. Hart. R. M. Welch, W. A. Norvell and L. V. Kochian, “Transport Interactions between Cadmium and Zinc in Roots of Bread and Durum Wheat Seedlings,” Physiologia Plantarum, Vol. 116, No. 1, 2002, pp. 73-78. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1160109.x
- I. Cakmak, R. M. Welch, J. Hart, W. A. Norvell, L. Oztürk and L. V. Kochian, “Uptake and Retranslocation of Leaf-Applied Cadmium (109Cd) in Diploid, Tetraploid and Hexaploid Wheats,” Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 51, No. 343, 2000, pp. 221-226. doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.343.221
- F. J. Zhao, R. F. Jiang, S. J. Dunham and S. P. McGrath, “Cadmium Uptake, Translocation and Tolerance in the Hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri,” New Phytologist, Vol. 172, No. 4, 2006, pp. 646-654. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01867.x
- A. J. M. Baker, S. P. McGrath, R. D. Reeves and J. A. C. Smith, “Metal Hyperaccumulator Plants: A Review of the Ecology and Physiology of a Biochemical Resource for Phytoremediation of Metal-Polluted Soils,” In: N. Terry and G. Banuelos, Eds., Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Water, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 2000, pp. 85-107.
- B. H. Robinson, M. Leblanc, D. Petit, R. R. Brooks, J. H. Kirkman and P. E. H. Gregg, “The Potential of Thlaspi caerulescens for Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soils,” Plant and Soil, Vol. 203, No. 1, 1998, pp. 47-56. doi:10.1023/A:1004328816645
- V. Bert, I. Bonnin, P. Saumitou-Laprade, P. deLaguerie and D. Petit, “Do Arabidopsis halleri from Nonmetallicolous Populationsaccumulate Zinc and Cadmium More Effectively than Those from Metallicolous Populations?” New Phytologist, Vol. 155, No. 1, 2002, pp. 47-57. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00432.x
- X. E. Yang, X. X. Long, H. B. Ye, Z. L. He, D. V. Calvert and P. J. Stoffella, “Cadmium Tolerance and Hyperaccumulation in a New Znhyperaccumulating Plant Species (Sedum alfredii Hance),” Plant and Soil, Vol. 259, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 181-189. doi:10.1023/B:PLSO.0000020956.24027.f2
- S. Clemens, M. G. Palmgren and U. Kramer, “A Long Way Ahead: Understanding and Engineering Plant Metal Accumulation,” Trends in Plant Science, Vol. 7, 2002, pp. 309-315. doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02295-1
- D. E. Salt, R. D. Smith and I. Raskin, “Phytoremediation,” Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, Vol. 49, 1998, pp. 643-668.
- S. P. McGrath and F. J. Zhao, “Phytoextraction of Metals Andmetalloids from Contaminated Soils,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2003, pp. 277-282. doi:10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00060-0