Safety of Future NPPs Must Not Be in Conflict with Economics
- 1 JSC “AKME-Engineering”, Moscow, Russia
- 2 JSC “SSC RF-IPPE”, Obninsk, Russia
- 3 JSC “AKME-Engineering”, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
The conflict between safety and economics requirements is peculiar to the present nuclear power (NP). The main point of the conflict is that for traditional type reactors the increase of requirements to safety of nuclear power plants (NPP) worsens their economical characteristics. This is caused by large potential energy accumulated in reactor coolant. In the presented paper the opportunity and expediency of changeover to reactors with heavy liquid-metal coolants (HLMC) in future NP is grounded. First of all, this refers to lead-bismuth coolant (LBC) mastered in the process of operating nuclear submarines (NS) reactors. The reactor facilities (RFs) of that type cannot cause destruction of defense barriers and make possible deterministic elimination of severe accidents with catastrophic radioactivity release. So it will make possible to eliminate the highlighted conflict and reasons for existence of population’s radiophobia. Lead-bismuth fast reactor SVBR-100 with electric power of 100 MWe is the reactor facility of that type. The effect of accumulated in coolant potential energy on safety and economics is considered. Main specific features of SVBR-100 technology providing a high level of inherent self-protection and passive safety are presented.
- Spievak, I. and Weinberg, A.M. (1985) Inherently Safe Reactors. Annual Review of Energy, 10, 431-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.10.110185.002243
- Forsberg, C.W. and Weinberg, A.M. (1990) Advanced Reactors, Passive Safety, and Acceptance of Nuclear Energy. Annual Review of Energy, 15, 133-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.15.110190.001025
- Arutyunyan, R.V. (2013) Have We Got Safety Culture? Atomnaya Strategiya XXI, 83, 9-11 (in Russian) http://www.proatom.ru/
- (2011) Nucleonics Week, Vol. 52, No. 19, 12 May 2011, 6-7.
- Orlov, V.V., Avrorin, E.N., Adamov, E.O., et al. (1992) Nontraditional Concepts of NPPs with Natural Safety. Atomnaya Energiya, 72, 317-328 (in Russian).
- Toshinsky, G.I., Komlev, O.G., Stepanov, V.S., et al. (2008) Innovative Nuclear Technology Based on Modular Multi-purposed Lead-Bismuth Cooled Fast Reactors. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 50, 170-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.10.025
- Toshinsky, G.I., Komlev, O.G., Stepanov, V.S., et al. (2006) Nuclear Power Development in Market Conditions with Use of Multi-Purpose Modular Fast Reactors SVBR-75/100. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 236, 1490-1502.
- Zrodnikov, A.V., Chitaykin, V.I., Toshinsky, G.I., et al. (2001) NPP Based on Reactor Modules SVBR-75/100. Atomnaya Energiya, 91, 415-425 (in Russian).
- Report on Phase 1A of the International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO). IAEA-TECDOC-1362, 2004.
- Toshinsky, G.I., Komlev, O.G., Tormyshev, I.V. and Petrochenko, V.V. (2013) Effect of Potential Energy Stored in Reactor Facility Coolant on NPP Safety and Economic Parameters. World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 3, 59-64. http://www.scirp.org/journal/wjnst http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/wjnst.2013.32010
- Nuclear Terrorism. http://www.gochs.info/p669.htm
- IAEA (February 2006) Advanced Nuclear Plant Design Options to Cope with External Events. IAEA-TECDOC-1487. http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1487_web.pdf
- Ammirabile, L. European Project SARGEN_IV: Safety Approach and Assessment of GEN IV Reactors. http://www.iaea.org/NuclearPower/Downloadable/Meetings/2013/ 2013-02-26-02-27-TM-SFR/day-1/4-L.Ammirabile-EC.pdf
- IAEA, Vienna (2012) SAFETY OF NUCLAR POWER PLANTS: DESIGN, Specific Safety Requirements. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-2/1.